My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
07/31/74 Combined Meeting
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Town Board
>
1974
>
07/31/74 Combined Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2025 2:19:44 PM
Creation date
4/20/2004 10:20:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Ramsey Town Board/Burns/Oak Grove/Ham Lake/East Bethen & Gro
Document Date
07/31/1974
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 6- C.M.7/31/7~+ <br /> <br />Ernie: They have about 3,000 people. In talking with the County <br />Highway Dept. they say studies show they can grade a road every <br />day to maintain it for less than they can maintain blacktop° <br />Blacktopping their streets would be prohibitive. <br /> <br />Grow: New developments require blacktop. <br /> <br />Hutchinson: He doesn't think 2½ acres is a good minimum. <br /> <br />~s Berg: Couldn't get a loan on a 20 acre piece at the bank. <br /> He had to cut it down to l0 acres and run a road across <br />the other l0 acres. <br /> <br />Cox: If we went to 20 acre requirement in the northern area of <br />the Township the same thing would happen that has happened in the <br />communities to the south of us. <br /> <br />Bill Nelson: Has the Metro Council approved this 20 acre idea? <br /> <br />Answer: Metro Council has not approved this as yet. With 20 <br />acres you are legislating growth, you are going to own a lot of <br />land when sewer goes in. It is discriminating against the land <br />owner and the individual who wants to move into your community. <br />A lot size of this requirement is discriminating decision and he <br />thinks a court would look at it the same way. Such large areas <br />would acquire, junk, garbage and everything lyou can think of. <br />They will create eye sores in the community. <br /> <br />Cox: He has noticed a new attitude on the part of the Metro <br />Council. <br /> <br />Jim Barton of the Metro Council: Some of the comments are well <br />taken. They are trying to come ~up with some standards. They <br />have completed an analysis of soil capabilities and environmental <br />considerations. They are also studying emissions from power <br />plants. Some people bought a large acreage and this is their <br />next egg. Restraints on the property are the soil conditions. <br />One community is going to deeper wells. This combined meeting <br />is a fine thing and he would like to see more of it. How much <br />pollution are we going to accept? <br /> <br />Holasek: He is not sure this is a good question. How do you <br />control orderly growth? He had just attended a convention in the <br />State of Maryland which was attended by people from all across <br />the U.S. Some places have 40 acre restrictions. This is the <br />biggest waste of land and it won't hold. It has taken good land <br />out of production. You haven't seen a weed patchunless you have <br />seen a 20 or ~0 acre weed patch. They habe urban sprawl all over <br />the world. You can't farm ~0 acres. There is a worldwide food <br />shortage and he doesn't feel such land can be taken out of food <br />production. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.