Laserfiche WebLink
Init. <br />§ 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the <br />Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Architect's response to such requests <br />shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. <br />§ 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable <br />from the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations <br />and decisions, the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by both Owner and Contractor, shall not <br />show partiality to either, and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. The <br />Architect's decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the <br />Contract Documents. <br />§ 3.6.2.5 Unless the Owner and Contractor designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker, as that <br />term is defined in AIA Document A201-2007, the Architect shall render initial decisions on Claims between the <br />Owner and Contractor as provided in the Contract Documents. <br />§ 3.6.3 CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR <br />§ 3.6.3.1 The Architect shall review and certify the amounts due the Contractor and shall issue certificates in such <br />amounts. The Architect's certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Owner, based on the <br />Architect's evaluation of the Work as provided in Section 3.6.2 and on the data comprising the Contractor's <br />Application for Payment, that, to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief, the Work has <br />progressed to the point indicated and that the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. <br />The foregoing representations are subject (1) to an evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Contract <br />Documents upon Substantial Completion, (2) to results of subsequent tests and inspections, (3) to correction of <br />minor deviations from the Contract Documents prior to completion, and (4) to specific qualifications expressed by <br />the Architect. <br />§ 3.6.3.2 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Architect has (1) made <br />exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work, (2) reviewed construction <br />means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, (3) reviewed copies of requisitions received from <br />Subcontractors and material suppliers and other data requested by the Owner to substantiate the Contractor's right to <br />payment, or (4) ascertained how or for what purpose the Contractor has used money previously paid on account of <br />the Contract Sum. <br />§ 3.6.3.3 The Architect shall maintain a record of the Applications and Certificates for Payment. <br />§ 3.6.4 SUBMITTALS <br />§ 3.6.4.1 The Architect shall review the Contractor's submittal schedule and shall not unreasonably delay or withhold <br />approval. The Architect's action in reviewing submittals shall be taken in accordance with the approved submittal <br />schedule or, in the absence of an approved submittal schedule, with reasonable promptness while allowing sufficient <br />time in the Architect's professional judgment to permit adequate review. <br />§ 3.6.4.2 In accordance with the Architect -approved submittal schedule, the Architect shall review and approve or <br />take other appropriate action upon the Contractor's submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples, <br />but only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept <br />expressed in the Contract Documents. Review of such submittals is not for the purpose of determining the accuracy <br />and completeness of other information such as dimensions, quantities, and installation or performance of equipment <br />or systems, which are the Contractor's responsibility. The Architect's review shall not constitute approval of safety <br />precautions or, unless otherwise specifically stated by the Architect, of any construction means, methods, <br />techniques, sequences or procedures. The Architect's approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an <br />assembly of which the item is a component. <br />§ 3.6.4.3 If the Contract Documents specifically require the Contractor to provide professional design services or <br />certifications by a design professional related to systems, materials or equipment, the Architect shall specify the <br />appropriate performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. The Architect shall review Shop <br />Drawings and other submittals related to the Work designed or certified by the design professional retained by the <br />Contractor that bear such professional's seal and signature when submitted to the Architect. The Architect shall be <br />AIA Document B10110 — 2007 (formerly 8161 TM —1997). Copyright ®1974, 1978, 1987, 1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights <br />reserved. WARNING; This AIA, Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of <br />this AIA' Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible <br />under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 10:10:07 on 07/02/2015 under Order No. 8583696391 which expires on 07/01/2016, and Is not <br />for resale. <br />User Notes: (3B9ADA20) <br />