My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/08/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 09/08/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:08:29 PM
Creation date
9/9/2015 9:14:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/08/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. POLICY BOARD BUSINESS <br />5.01: Revisit the Question to be Asked as Part of the Citizen Engagement Process for the <br />Environmental Protection/Resource Management Chapter of the Comprehensive <br />Plan <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He noted before staff moves forward with the <br />public engagement process regarding the Comprehensive Plan, they wanted to have a <br />conversation with the Board to proceed with the questions that had been developed. Specifically, <br />the question of "What value do natural resources and environmental sustainability add to your <br />neighborhood?" has been discussed previously, and he said he is seeking further discussion on it. <br />He pointed out there will be further opportunities to solicit feedback such as at the Draw Concert <br />series, and upcoming Happy Days. The questions will also be brought before the City Council <br />before adoption. <br />Board Member Bentz commented the question sounded good. <br />Board Member Valentine stated it had come to his attention in the last year that the word <br />"sustainability" had become a bad word. Hasked if that word could be removed because it can <br />be a distraction for some people. <br />Board Member Lewis mentioned he als `-does no " approve of the word "sustainability". He <br />added the word "environmental" can stay if needed. He suggested the question read "What value <br />do natural resources add to your neighborhood?" <br />Chairperson Stodola stated he approves of the wore "sustainability" and did not think it posed a <br />problem. <br />Board ber Lewis clarified he did not think . tas a very clear word. <br />Chairperson Stodola said he liked Board Member Lewis' suggested question because it is clearer. <br />He suggested replacing the world "neighborhood" with "community". He said he thinks the word <br />"community" invites people to think more broadly. <br />Consensus was reached to use the word "neighborhood" in place of "community". <br />City Planner Anderson offered to eliminate the word "sustainability". He explained he added it <br />in to address one of the discussions that occurred in May, because one of the Members wanted to <br />see more environmental types of questions. He said people may or may not see it as negative. <br />He concluded the word may come up in workshop discussions and as part of the neighborhood <br />process. <br />Council Member Bentz asked if it is a mandate of a Comprehensive Plan to address <br />sustainability. <br />City Planner Anderson responded it should be acknowledged and incorporated into a Comp Plan. <br />He said it is not a required element of the Comp Plan. <br />Environmental Policy Board / August 17, 2015 <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.