Laserfiche WebLink
5. POLICY BOARD BUSINESS <br />5.01: Revisit the Question to be Asked as Part of the Citizen Engagement Process for the <br />Environmental Protection/Resource Management Chapter of the Comprehensive <br />Plan <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He noted before staff moves forward with the <br />public engagement process regarding the Comprehensive Plan, they wanted to have a <br />conversation with the Board to proceed with the questions that had been developed. Specifically, <br />the question of "What value do natural resources and environmental sustainability add to your <br />neighborhood?" has been discussed previously, and he said he is seeking further discussion on it. <br />He pointed out there will be further opportunities to solicit feedback such as at the Draw Concert <br />series, and upcoming Happy Days. The questions will also be brought before the City Council <br />before adoption. <br />Board Member Bentz commented the question sounded good. <br />Board Member Valentine stated it had come to his attention in the last year that the word <br />"sustainability" had become a bad word. Hasked if that word could be removed because it can <br />be a distraction for some people. <br />Board Member Lewis mentioned he als `-does no " approve of the word "sustainability". He <br />added the word "environmental" can stay if needed. He suggested the question read "What value <br />do natural resources add to your neighborhood?" <br />Chairperson Stodola stated he approves of the wore "sustainability" and did not think it posed a <br />problem. <br />Board ber Lewis clarified he did not think . tas a very clear word. <br />Chairperson Stodola said he liked Board Member Lewis' suggested question because it is clearer. <br />He suggested replacing the world "neighborhood" with "community". He said he thinks the word <br />"community" invites people to think more broadly. <br />Consensus was reached to use the word "neighborhood" in place of "community". <br />City Planner Anderson offered to eliminate the word "sustainability". He explained he added it <br />in to address one of the discussions that occurred in May, because one of the Members wanted to <br />see more environmental types of questions. He said people may or may not see it as negative. <br />He concluded the word may come up in workshop discussions and as part of the neighborhood <br />process. <br />Council Member Bentz asked if it is a mandate of a Comprehensive Plan to address <br />sustainability. <br />City Planner Anderson responded it should be acknowledged and incorporated into a Comp Plan. <br />He said it is not a required element of the Comp Plan. <br />Environmental Policy Board / August 17, 2015 <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />