My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/08/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 09/08/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:08:29 PM
Creation date
9/9/2015 9:14:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/08/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board Member Covart commented using the word "sustainability" may make people feel it is <br />something they can do something about. She suggested using the word "renewable". She said <br />that may bring in the idea of active participation. <br />City Planner Peterson clarified that the word "natural resources" should be changed to <br />"renewable resources". <br />Board Member Covart said she didn't have a concrete suggestion, and just wanted to suggest the <br />word "renewable" be added. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau noted he approved of using the words "natural resources" because <br />it makes people think of natural things. We want to raise awareness of water and renewable <br />resources, and he said he would like to have people be brought into a discussion of how we can <br />address the aquifer and other issues. If the word "renewable" helps open up the conversation, <br />then it should be used. He suggested the question read, "What value does environmental and <br />natural and renewable resources add to your community." He pointed out water is renewable. <br />Trees are somewhat renewable, and compost and recycling is more renewable than natural <br />resources. <br />Chairperson Stodola stated the word "renewable" was redundant. <br />Board Member Bentz commented these words are more along the lines of reclaiming rather than <br />renewable. He suggested creating a statement with the words "renewable" and "reclaimable", as <br />they both fit under the umbrella of "sustainability". He stated a moderator in a discussion may <br />be able to suggest words that others may not think of. He said preservation is a large part of this <br />subject, and others may not think of this as sustainable. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated he would like to find words that resonate with the public. <br />Chairperson Stodola noted he had thought over the situation and he would no longer like to keep <br />the word "sustainability" in. He said if the Board is having this much discussion over it, the <br />public could be unsettled. <br />Board Member Lewis suggested the word "sustainability" be replaced with "conservation". He <br />stated it may be more to the point. He clarified the question would then read, "What value do <br />natural resources and conservation add to your neighborhood?" <br />It was the consensus of the Environmental Policy Board to move ahead with the question: <br />"What value do natural resources and conservation add to your community?" <br />Councilmember LeTourneau asked when this item will come before the Council. <br />City Planner Anderson replied it will be either the 25th of August or the 8th of September. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau suggested this question be posted at Happy Days. <br />Environmental Policy Board / August 17, 2015 <br />Page 3 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.