Laserfiche WebLink
Phase 3 <br />1 R-2 Medium Density Residential 38.915 1,289 <br />2 E-2 Employment District 28.612 958 <br />4 R-1 MUSA 4.107 419 <br />5 R-1 MUSA 30.508 683 <br />Phase 3 Totals <br />Not Included in Calculations <br />102.141 3,349 <br />6 Public/Quasi-Public 86.422 <br />Totals all Phases 274.064 <br />3,488 <br />10,474 <br />The zoning classifications listed in the table above are based on anticipated future zoning for the study <br />area. Gross areas and frontages are based on GIS information and will most likely be refined during <br />subsequent phases of project development. <br />Several of the parcels were previously assessed for improvements constructed in 2011. The <br />improvements made previously were in direct benefit to parcel 6 to allow for development. Although <br />development did not occur at that time, no further improvements will be required to serve that parcel. <br />Parcel 6 was therefor excluded from calculations that follow. A portion of the improvements will be paid <br />by the City either through utility funds or other means. A list of assumptions is as follows: <br />• All trunk water and sanitary sewer system costs will be paid for through the City utility funds, <br />• Assessments will be made to benefitting properties as each phase is constructed, <br />• Three standard methods of assessments were analyzed including: Frontage, Area, and Per Lot. <br />• The City's existing assessment policy very closely matches the Frontage method, and <br />• Gross acreage was used in lieu of net developable acreage in the calculations below. <br />The table below depicts a distribution based on all costs being assessed to the benefitting properties. <br />We have assumed for this analysis the costs would be assessed to properties benefitting from each <br />phase of construction. For instance, properties directly benefitting from Phase 1 improvements would <br />be assessed for Phase 1 costs at the time of Phase 1 improvements. Some lots benefit from more than <br />one phase of construction and would be assessed as future phases are constructed. <br />Calculations were based on the areas and front footages (shown on page 12), along with the costs per <br />phase (shown on page 10). Trunk sanitary sewer and trunk watermain were considered City costs and <br />were not included in the calculations. For comparison, a summary of the unit costs used in the <br />calculations is presented below: <br />Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. COST ALLOCATION ALTERNATIVES <br />City of Ramsey — Future Business Park Page 13 <br />