Agenda - Council - 08/23/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FINDINC.~ OF FAC'I' RUN RIVER Hlr.?.c: PLANNED UNI'~ DEVELOPiqEN~ 1) That the applicant has properly applied for the approval of a Planned Unit Development known as Rum River Hills. 2} That the applicant appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission and City Council for concept approval. 3) That all the commissions approved of the applicant's concept and that the minutes of their meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 4) That the applicant's request includes zoning for residential, rural business and recreational open space. 5) That the concept is consistent with Ramsey's Comprehensive Plan. 6) That the applicant's request is for 20 (twenty) residential units, 13 (thirteen) acres of rural business and 6 (six) acres of future multiple family residential. 7) That the City ordinance would permit 19 (nineteen) ~mits of residential units using increases allowed by ordinance. 8) That with the added area of the White Pines Park and portions of some residential lots in White Pines Estates will allow for one additional residential site. 9) That the property previously rezoned as rural business and that which is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan is approximately thirteen (13) acres in size which is consistent with the applicant's request. 10) That the two parcels designated as outlots for future development with multiple dwellings shall not be developed until such time as municipal services (City sewer and water) are available. 11) That the plan is designed to form a desirable and unified development within its own boundaries. 12) That the proposed uses .will not be detrimental to present and ~uture land uses in the surrounding area. 13) That there are no variances requested to any standard requirements of the zoning and subdivision ordinance. 14) That the plan will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve, or are proposed to serve, the planned development. 15) That the planned development will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of neighboring property. 16) That concept approval was based on only one access from State Highway #47°