Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Policy Board (EPB) 5. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 08/17/2015 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Discuss Potential Policy to Address Buildable Area on Parcels with Floodplains and Wetlands <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider developing a policy to address recent concerns about the amount of <br />remaining buildable area on a lot after construction of a home. Primarily, the intent is to protect eventual property <br />owners after the initial construction of a home to ensure adequate buildable area to create what an ordinary citizen <br />would consider a back yard. <br />Over the past several years, the City has received feedback from residents concerning the remaining available <br />buildable area on certain parcels once wetlands and floodplain restrictions are factored into the equation. This <br />concern typically arises as part of the review of a Building Permit application for decks (or other typical <br />homeowner additions) in which wetlands, stormwater ponds, or other infrastructure reduces the net (remaining) <br />buildable area. The outcome usually involves approval from the City of an Encroachment Agreement and <br />potentially approval by the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (WMO) of a No Loss <br />Exemption (wetland encroachment). Both actions consume City resources and have a cost to the property owner, <br />both financially and in terms of time. <br />City Staff recently reviewed this topic with the City Council (that case is attached for reference). The outcome of <br />that discussion was for Staff to work with the EPB and the Planning Commission to develop potential <br />ideas/solutions to help eliminate, or at least reduce, these types of conflicts from occurring in the future. As part of <br />this discussion, the following goals should be considered: <br />1. Minimize common conflicts for future property owner after initial construction of principal structure. <br />2. Ensure sufficient area for rear decks (and possibly other common homeowner improvements). <br />3. Ensure sufficient area for back yard (as interpreted by the average resident). <br />4. Provide language that is easily interpreted with minimal 'if, then' or contingent scenarios. <br />5. Do not create new issues by solving current issue(s). <br />6. Ensure that any policy amendment is not confused City's previous wetland protection ordinance (aka wetland <br />buffer). In other words, the focus of this policy discussion should be on minimum buildable area <br />requirements. principal structure setbacks, or other ideas, rather than on water quality measures (buffers). <br />It is worth noting that at least part of the reason for the increase in these requests and concerns is a result of a <br />declining inventory of vacant lots with the more challenging and/or less desirable lots now being built out. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Staff has identified at least two (2) possible options that could be considered: <br />1. Minimum buildable area requirement; or <br />2. Minimum principal structure setback from wetlands, floodplains, and storm sewer pipes. <br />City Code presently specifies minimum lot sizes for each zoning district. In residential areas, the minimum required <br />lot size is 10,800 square feet for lots within the R-1 Residential (MUSA) District and 2.5 acres for lots within the <br />R-1 Residential (Rural Developing) District. However, especially within the MUSA district, there are a number of <br />examples of lots that are 3/4 to 1 acre in size but have greatly restricted buildable area due to wetlands, flooplains, <br />or stormwater infrastructure, or some combination of these. Also, since the shape of lots can vary greatly, <br />