Laserfiche WebLink
8. That the Applicant is proposing to construct the detached accessory building to provide <br /> additional storage space for vehicles/equipment as well as providing space for their hobby <br /> woodworking. <br /> 9. That on properties less than two(2)acres in size, City Code Section 117-349(d)(12)requires <br /> detached accessory buildings to be in the side or rear yard only and shall not be located nearer <br /> the front property line than the principal building. <br /> 10. That City Code Section 117-111 (d) specifies that the minimum front yard setback shall not <br /> be less than forty(40) feet. <br /> 11. That a portion of the detached accessory building would be nearer the front property line <br /> than the principal building. <br /> 12. That based on the information submitted, it is unknown what the front yard setback would <br /> be. <br /> 13. That the addition would be located ten(10) feet from the side property line, which meets the <br /> minimum required setback. <br /> 14. That the Subject property is relatively flat without significant grade changes other than along <br /> the southern lot line (approximately a two [2] foot slope). <br /> 15. That an existing chain link fence will need to be eliminated or modified to accommodate the <br /> proposed location for the detached accessory building. <br /> 16. That the Applicant has stated that adding on to the attached garage is not practical due to <br /> design constraints and maintaining access to the rear yard for septic pumping. <br /> 17. That based on the as-built drawing of the septic system, the drainfield and tank are located <br /> in the central portion of the rear yard. <br /> 18. That based on the submitted information and available data,it appears the proposed detached <br /> accessory building could be shifted to the east slightly(toward the rear yard)or be located in <br /> an alternative location (possibly near the southeast corner of the Subject Property), which <br /> would eliminate the need for a variance. <br /> 19. That the principal building is set back approximately fifty (50) feet from the front property <br /> line. <br /> 20. That the owner of the property to the south of the Subject Property has stated their opposition <br /> to the requested variance. <br /> 21. That the Engineering Department has reviewed the request with regard to potential drainage <br /> impacts and has stated that any additional runoff would likely be contained within the <br /> RESOLUTION#15-10-257 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />