Resolution - #15-10-257 - 10/13/2015

Home

existing Drainage and Utility Easement,which is twenty(20) feet wide,with ten(10) feet on each side of this common lot line, and would ultimately drain to the street. 22. That the Applicant has not clearly indicated whether a driveway would be installed, if the existing driveway would be extended, or if no driveway would be provide to access the proposed detached accessory building. 23. That economic circumstances alone do not create the practical difficulties. 24. That the plight is not due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property. 25. That the plight was created by the Applicant. 26. That, if granted, the variance will alter the locality's essential character. 27. That, if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. 28. That, if granted, the variance will not have the effect of allowing a use that is prohibited in the applicable zoning district. 29. That, if granted, the variance will not unreasonably increase the congestion on the public street. 30. That, if granted, the variance will not adversely impact the degree of public health, safety and general welfare provided for in the Ramsey City Code. 31. That, if granted, the variance will not diminish established property values within the neighborhood. 32. That there are alternative locations on the Subject Property that could accommodate the detached accessory building without the need for a variance or the size of the detached accessory building could be reduced to eliminate the need for a variance. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Van Scoy, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Vice Chairperson Bauer Commissioner Brauer Commissioner Van Scoy Commissioner Andrusko Commissioner Nosan and the following voted against the same: None RESOLUTION#15-10-257 Page 3 of 4