Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Johns brought up the issue of demolition of buildings the City owns. She asked <br /> if there will be a cost. <br /> Economic Development Manager/Assistant City Administrator Brama replied there will be a <br /> cost, and he estimated the budget should include $100,000 for this. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill advised the buildings would not necessarily have to <br /> be demolished. They can be, but if the cost is prohibitive, they wouldn't need to be. <br /> Councilmember Shryock commented she likes the layout of Option A. It appears to be a good <br /> work flow. She said she didn't think she would be in favor of a McKinley Street extension. She <br /> related it to the situation on Sunfish Lake Road and the railroad which causes a lot of issues. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill agreed this situation does need more conversation <br /> and consideration. <br /> Councilmember Johns stated Option A is more appealing to her. <br /> Chairperson Riley commented it shows Staff has put a lot of thought into all of this. He <br /> questioned the process timeline as it seems we are a year ahead of this timeline. <br /> Economic Development Manager/Assistant City Administrator Brama explained he and the staff <br /> put this together quite a while ago. The timeline is off. He said the architect group managing <br /> this, BKV Group, said the soonest they could get this done even if the City was in a position to <br /> have them start now, is 2017. <br /> Chairperson Riley questioned if developable land could be sold in the future to help pay for the <br /> future public works campus. <br /> Economic Development Manager/Assistant City Administrator Brama replied this would need <br /> more research. There are different funding sources. This could become complicated very <br /> quickly, so there will be more discussion. He advised the BKV Group will make a more detailed <br /> presentation in November. <br /> 6. COMMITTEE / STAFF INPUT <br /> City Engineer Westby noted the Committee had asked for an update on the flashing arrow on <br /> lights. He said the City's systems are owned by Anoka County and the state. However there is <br /> one light that is owned solely by the state, which is at Sunwood and County Road 83. While it is <br /> on a County road, the County has said it is 100% City maintenance. Many times the County <br /> pays a portion of the costs, but they do not with this one. He noted converting all the other lights <br /> to flashing arrows would normally cost $50,000 to $75,000. The cost is $25,000 per cabinet. <br /> The lights would need to be reprogrammed. It is expensive to convert an old system. MnDOT <br /> currently does not have any plans to convert any of these lights. There are four lights in the City <br /> that are being considered for conversion from other systems. SEH has been hired to conduct a <br /> Public Works Committee/ October 20, 2015 <br /> Page 8 of 10 <br />