My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 10/13/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2015
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 10/13/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 3:14:09 PM
Creation date
11/23/2015 2:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/13/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember LeTourneau asked and received confirmation that the option for six color issues <br />would eliminate the concurrent mailing with the utility bill and would have separate mailing. <br />Mayor Strommen confirmed the consensus of the Council to delay the decision at this time until <br />further discussion can occur at a future worksession and direct staff to print the January/February <br />edition in black and white, which will be mailed with the utility billing. <br />2.03: Discuss Potential Tenant for Leasing Space on the Second Flood of the Ramsey <br />Municipal Center <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama reviewed the staff report. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that his number one concern would be that the City is marketing <br />below market rate, but noted that the rate is market rate and has been advertised for the past year <br />and would have been available to other interested parties. He referenced the tenant <br />improvements and stated that he would have concern with the City funding a large portion of the <br />tenant improvements and would possibly support a small amount of those improvements, as that <br />would be more in line with market rate. <br />Mayor Strommen stated that in the future there may be a better community or public use for that <br />space but recognized that there is open space. She stated that she would also be interested in the <br />tenant improvements and how those would be funded. She explained that if the City contributed <br />too much to the improvements the City would not obtain a profit from the lease. <br />Councilmember Williams stated that the details seem to be typical of a sublease deal and she is <br />curious to see how the tenant improvements would shake out. She stated that the longer the <br />lease, the more likely the leaseholder would be willing to contribute to those improvements. <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama stated that the longer the lease <br />the more likely the City would be able to recoup some of those tenant improvement costs but <br />noted that if the Council is not comfortable with five or ten years for a lease perhaps this would <br />not be the right tenant fit. <br />Mayor Strommen confirmed the consensus of the Council that ten years would be too long fora <br />lease and even five years does not seem to fit comfortably with the Council, as this is not the best <br />tenant fit for the space, especially considering the level of tenant improvements that would be <br />necessary. <br />3. TOPICS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION <br />3.01: Review Future Topics/Calendar <br />Mayor Strommen stated that the list of topics was included in the packet and asked for input on <br />any topics that may be missing from that list. <br />City Council Work Session / October 13, 2015 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.