My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/27/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2004
>
Minutes - Council - 04/27/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:46:23 PM
Creation date
4/30/2004 1:23:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/27/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Elvig, Cook, Kurak, Strommen, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #3) Quarterly Review of Franchise Fee Collections <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig reported for the period ending March 31, 2004, the City received $129,839 <br />in fl'anchisc fees. $404,000 was projected to be generated in franchise fee revenue for the year <br />2004, and the actual collection is approximately 20 percent higher than the estimate. There was <br />discussion amongst the committee and the feeling was that it is potentially too early in the <br />process to know the budget will be met for the year, due to climbing interest rates and other <br />factors. The feeling of the committee was to strongly look at this at the end of the half year, but <br />not remove the fee at this point based on these numbers. <br /> <br />Motion by Councihnember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Zimmerman, to ratify the <br />recommendation of the Finance Committee and adopt Resolution #04-04-098 authorizing the <br />conlinuation of the Franchise Fee. <br /> <br />Counci hnembcr Kurak questioned how the recommendation to continue the fi'anchise fee is <br />justified with the next case that outlines the money left over from last year. <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Elvig explained the Finance Committee had some of the same concerns. The <br />fccling was regardless of what was captured last year they still have to go forward with this <br />year's budget, l-te noted he was opposed to franchise fees when they were adopted by the <br />Council, but understands that the budget had to be maintained for this year, and there are a lot of <br />Capital hnprovement Projects coming forward. He stated development dollars should go <br />towards things that are causing development costs in the City. That is where they segregated the <br />two issues. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was to table the discussion of Case #3 until the discussion of Case <br />#1 has been completed. <br /> <br />Case #1) Authorize Transfer of General Fund Revenues <br /> <br />Councihncmber Elvig explained it has been the policy in the past that the City does not take any <br />extra revenues forward fi'om the past year in the general fund budget. The excess revenues have <br />been transferred to the following funds: Equipment Revolving Fund (10%), Facilities <br />Construction Fund (40%), and Public Improvement Revolving Fund (50%). After meeting the <br />fired balance requirements at year end, $650,956.94 remained as excess revenues to be <br />transferred fi'om the General Fund. Staff has suggested rather than the transfer of funds <br />according to the policy, a more appropriate transfer would be as follows: <br /> <br />Facility Construction Fund: <br />PIR Fund: <br />Equipment Revolving Fund: <br /> <br />$485,869.35 - City Hall <br /> 100,000.00 - Park and Ride <br /> 65,096.59 - Transfer to future park fund <br /> <br />City Council/April 27, 2004 <br /> Page 14 of 35 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.