My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/27/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2004
>
Minutes - Council - 04/27/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:46:23 PM
Creation date
4/30/2004 1:23:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/27/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
All Parks Irrigation for all manicured lawn areas <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson explained there is a great deal of imagery and <br />construction drawings that are near completion. The parks proposal is to provide 4.2 million <br />dollars in improvements and roughly 2.1 million dollars in land for park purposes. It also states <br />the developer will contribute $1,500 per building permit that is issued into an escrow under his <br />control for Civic Square and Downtown Commons. This agreement would amend the Master <br />Agreement by adding a new Section 15.3(e) which reads "Failure by the Developer to perform <br />the Developer's obligations under the Parkland Trail Plan Agreement for Ramsey Town Center <br />effective as of the __ day of ,2004." He explained the letter of credit is not needed because <br />the value of the land serves as the credit. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig indicated Section 7.2 should require the developer to supply the City with <br />evidence of filing. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig suggested Section 7.4 include a statement specifying a reasonable period <br />of time and just cause in relation to performance of any of the obligations. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained as it is written this is stating if the City agrees it can extend the <br />performance by the developer or if the developer agrees it can extend the performance by the <br />City. He explained "of another" is the key word. He noted Section 7.2 should read "Parkland <br />and Trail Agreement Plan" rather than "Master Agreement". The City does have the recording <br />data back on the Master Development Agreement. <br /> <br />Counci hnember Kurak questioned if the Master Development Agreement can be changed <br />without the other party being present. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained this will be in addition to the Master Development Agreement <br />according to paragraph 4.11 of that agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig inquired about Section 5.4. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson explained it has always been the intention that the City <br />will finalize each of the plans that go forward, which is why the 4.2 million dollar improvements <br />were reiterated. If there is a change to the cost of some of these items shown on the concept <br />plans then that money can be rolled into the improvements of another aspect that was not <br />included in the original proposal. He explained that the City is the ultimate authority approving <br />what goes into their parks. <br /> <br />Motion by Councihnember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Elvig, to recommend acceptance <br />of the RTC Parks Proposal by amending the Master Development Agreement by entering into an <br />the attached agreement contingent upon the changes that the Parks Commission recommended, <br />and with Section 7.2 amended to state "The Developer must record this Parkland and Trail <br />Agreement..." <br /> <br />City Council/April 27, 2004 <br /> Page 32 of 35 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.