My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/04/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/04/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:23:11 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 10:28:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/04/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
residential lots to 135 and retain a strip of industrial property adjacent to County Road #56. <br />Council directed that the revised rezoning be forwarded to the Planning Commission for additional <br />review. The Planning Commission conducted another public hearing on March 4, 1996, and is <br />recommending approval of the proposed modification to the rezoning configuration for Pondview. <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember. Beahen to adopt Resolution <br />#96-03-050 to rescind Resolution #96-01-027 and adopt amended Findings of Fact #0395 relating <br />to a request from Good Value Homes to rezone certain property from Industrial to R-1 Urban <br />Residential. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beahen, Beyer and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to introduced an <br />ordinance to rezone certain property in Section 27 from Industrial to R-1 Urban Residential. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beahen, Beyer and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br />Case #5: Request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Pondview; Case of Good <br />Value Homes <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik pointed out this is a preliminary plat approval request of the property <br />Council just voted to rezone. Along with the rezoning modification, the Developer had made some <br />design modifications to the plat which consisted of dead ending 147th Avenue at the east boundary <br />of the industrial parcel and extending Limonite Street north to 149th Lane in Peltzer Addition as a <br />through street and access to C.S.A.H. #56. The developer's reasons for these modifications were <br />to delay connecting 147th with C.S.A.H. #56 until such time as the commercial property develops <br />to allow some flexibility in the development of the commercial parcel and access to it. The through <br />street to 149th and C.S.A.H. #56 provides an alternate ingress/egress to the plat from #56 until <br />such ti as the commercial . arcel develo • s and the extension of 147th to #56 is com.IeiE ' <br />ouncil ha. una. ' 'sous a • ee• at should be extened as ori • nall . ro• oseto intersect <br />with A #56 There were differing opinions regarding w ether or not Limoni <br />should be extended into Peltzer Addition as a through street to 149th and eventual access to #56. <br />By a 3/2 vote, Council requested that the Planning Commission consider a plan that would provide <br />for the connection of 147th with #56 and Limonite Street terminating at 148th. Councilmember <br />Zimmerman requested that the Planning Commission reconsider whether or not the extension of <br />Limonite Street as a through street to 149th will be a benefit. As was stated before, the developer <br />provided City staff with another revision that reinstated 147th as a through street to C.S.A.H. #56 <br />and retained Limonite Street as a through street to 149th. The Planning Commission held a public <br />hearing on this plan and it was forwarded to the Anoka County Highway Department for review <br />and comment. The Planning Commission recommended that Council grant preliminary plat <br />approval to Pondview with 147th terminating at the east boundary of the commercial parcel and <br />extending Limonite Street as a through street to 149th Lane. Ms. Frolik noted the letter from <br />Anoka County Highway Department. They seem to be saying that if 147th Avenue is not <br />constructed at this time as a through street for C.R. #56, they may lose #56 to 147th. <br />Councilmember Peterson questioned if the County was saying no more access on #56. <br />John Peterson, Good Value Homes, felt the County was trying to encourage them to build this <br />small section of street but they said all commercial had to access that only by 147th. We have had <br />a lot of discussion on this strip of road. If it needs to go in, we will put it in; we will not "go to the <br />wall" for this. He would agree with whatever Council felt is best. The County is saying you will <br />t <br />City Council/March 12, 1996 <br />Page 8 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.