My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/04/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/04/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:23:11 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 10:28:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/04/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
have no access here if you do not put in 142nd; City staff and the Planning Commission support <br />Limonite. <br />Mayor Hardin questioned if Mr. Peterson was not opposed to both roads. <br />Derrick Passe, Passe Engineering, stated he did not feel the County was saying 147th could not be <br />realized through the commercial site. It may be a benefit to swing the road south and have the <br />structure at 147th and south. That's the place that the County wants to have the access through <br />147th. <br />Mr. Peterson asked about having some language that states the expectation is that 147th will go up <br />to the County Road. <br />Mr. Passe commented on the alignment of 147th and the traffic coming from the north traveling at <br />55 miles per hour. <br />Ben Deemer, representing the Planning Commission, stated he does not disagree with anything <br />that's been said. In his conversations with the Highway Department, #116 will carry more value <br />than #56 as right now #116 will have the right-of-way off #56. The County has some plans for <br />#116 that they have not told us about yet. <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to grant preliminary <br />plat approval of to Pondview with 147th terminating at the eastern boundary of the commercial site <br />with clarification from the County that they will not prohibit the eventual extension of 147th to <br />C.R. #56 through the commercial site and that Limonite Street extend north as a through street. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beahen, Beyer and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br />Case #6: Request for Revision to Approved Preliminary Plat for Chestnut <br />Ridge 2nd Addition; Case of John Peterson, Good Value Homes <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik reminded Council that they had previously granted preliminary plat <br />approval to Chestnut Ridge 2nd Addition which consisted of 73 single family lots. The developer <br />is requesting a minor modification to the approved plat to construct the cul-de-sac on the north side <br />of Sunwood Drive as a through street to intersect with Sunwood Drive. This modification is <br />precipitated by the realignment of Sunwood Drive to the north. This realignment made the lots on <br />the south end of the cul-de-sac substandard and forced the road to go through as a through street. <br />The developer then gained developable property on the south side of Sunwood Drive and was able <br />to replace the lots lost on the north side of Sunwood Drive. <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained that this modification is not significant enough to warrant a <br />public hearing. <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Mayor Hardin to approve the revised <br />preliminary plat for Chestnut Ridge 2nd Addition prepared by Passe Engineering, Inc. and entitled <br />Preliminary Plat of Chestnut Ridge 3rd and 4th Additions. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Hardin, Beahen and <br />Beyer. Voting No: None. <br />City Council/March 12, 1996 <br />Page 9 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.