Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner VanScoy did not see a reason to change the City's standards. He did not believe <br />that the proposed language changes would eliminate all noise complaints. Development Services <br />Manager Gladhill was of the opinion that public perception would be improved based on the <br />code amendment and noted that construction hours could now be negotiated. <br />Commissioner Andrusko recommended that all emergency City work be allowed outside the <br />stated construction hours. He suggested the language regarding construction completed by <br />Ramsey homeowner's be clarified. <br />Commissioner VanScoy did not see a need to change the 10:00 p.m. construction stop time so <br />long as staff was allowed to negotiate construction hours. <br />Commissioner Brauer feared how staff would be impacted if they were forced to negotiate with <br />each construction company. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill questioned if the Commission wanted to change the <br />ending hours. <br />Commissioner Brauer stated nine neighboring communities specify 10:00 p.m. as their ending <br />time, while the remainder specified 8:00 p.m. as the ending time. He supported an 8:00 p.m. end <br />time. <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Andrusko, to recommend staff <br />proceed with the Code Amendment keeping the end time 10:00 p.m., that staff be allowed to <br />negotiate end times to 9:00 p.m., and that staff note the language changes discussed by <br />Commissioner Andrusko. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners VanScoy, and Andrusko. <br />Voting No: Brauer. Absent: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners Maul and Nosan. <br />5.05: Receive Future Business Park Infrastructure Analysis Preliminary Report <br />Presentation <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill presented the staff report stating the purpose of this <br />case is to review a preliminary report from Bolton & Menk on required infrastructure <br />improvements to the City's future business park; and to take comments/ suggestions. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill indicated the EDA reviewed this document in July; and <br />will be reviewing a revised version on August 13. Staff is not looking for a specific motion or <br />direction from the Planning Commission at this point. The intent is to simply convey they <br />information to the Planning Commission early in the process in order to frame future policy <br />discussions. That being said, Staff welcomes thoughts on the land use implications of the <br />proposed future improvements shown in the study. Adopting the study in no means obligates the <br />City to any improvements or investments. <br />Planning Commission/August 6, 2015 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />