Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill answered the medians mostly are at the request of <br />the developer and sometimes by request of the neighborhood. The purpose is to improve the <br />quality of the neighborhood. The City does not have the manpower to maintain them. If the City <br />takes on a few to maintain, then the City will receive requests to maintain more. As noted in the <br />previous agenda item, a policy is needed to determine responsibilities of maintenance. <br />Councilmember Shryock suggested while designing these medians keep in mind the daylilies <br />will spread. The medians could become a self -maintained area once the daylilies mature. <br />Adding rock or other landscape material may inhibit weed growth. She pointed out having low <br />maintenance plantings in the middle of the median should be considered. <br />Chairperson Riley clarified the question related to this item is whether river rock should be used <br />or another substance that will be discussed and approved with Public Works. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed this is the question before the Committee. <br />Councilmember Johns asked if the City owns this median, and sought confirmation that the <br />homeowner wanted to work with a landscaper working pro bono. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer responded the City does own the median and confirmed <br />the use of a pro bono landscaper. He acknowledged the City will still own the median. <br />Councilmember Shryock reasoned if there is a sidewalk, part of the maintenance responsibility <br />lies with the homeowners. Why not use this policy with medians. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill replied part of the reason is assessments. Being the <br />medians are in the middle, they become more of a public entity. <br />Motion by Councilmember Shryock, seconded by Councilmember Johns, to recommend that the <br />City Council direct Sweetbay Ridge to propose an alternative base material acceptable to the <br />Public Works Superintendent and subsequently allow said private improvement within the right <br />of way for 161st Avenue. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Johns and Shryock. Voting <br />No: None. <br />5.03: Consider Vacating Permanent Road Easement over a portion of 14911 Ramsey Blvd <br />and the Parcel to the North with a Property Identification Number (PIN) of 22-32- <br />25-33-0017 <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and noted the adjacent <br />property owner is willing to assume responsibility for this easement. He commented the sign for <br />Ramsey Market lies in the right of way. Election signs are frequently put in this easement. He <br />said some residents are aware this is a public right of way and call to express their concerns. <br />There are a lot of unnecessary disagreements with this parcel. If this request is approved, it will <br />Public Works Committee / October 20, 2015 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />