Laserfiche WebLink
simply become a driveway for Ramsey Market. This will require an access agreement for the <br />portion to the north. <br />Chairperson Riley questioned if the City would need to pay for the easement if it wanted to own <br />it. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill replied there would be an acquisition cost. <br />Councilmember Johns clarified the easement impacts two properties, so it will become a part of <br />each property. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill answered it will. The entire piece is under public <br />domain. <br />Chairperson Riley inquired if this parcel is typically purchased for a price, and the City simply <br />vacates it, if it would be considered unjustly enriching a landowner. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill replied the landowner has not requested this action. <br />The City initiated this request, and prefers to vacate the land. This is not typical and does not set <br />a precedent. The City spends a lot of time with concerns on this parcel, and a lot of time in <br />maintaining it and sending staff out for various reasons. <br />Motion by Councilmember Johns, seconded by Councilmember Shryock, to recommend that the <br />City Council adopt Ordinance #15-16 vacating the fifty (50) foot Permanent Road Easement on <br />14911 Ramsey Blvd and on the parcel with a Property Identification Number (PIN) of 22-32-25- <br />33-0017. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Johns and Shryock. Voting <br />No: None. <br />5.04: Approve Installation of Priority Street Light <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer reviewed the staff report. <br />Councilmember Johns asked if the residents are requesting this light, or if this is being done for <br />safety. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer responded this is a City request in an effort to keep up with <br />requirements. This is the most logical place to put a new light. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill added this intersection needs to be illuminated <br />better, so that is another reason for the light. <br />Councilmember Johns questioned where the next light is. <br />Public Works Committee / October 20, 2015 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />