Laserfiche WebLink
B. NOTE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> <br />Personnel Committee meeting of March 6, 1981. <br /> <br />The cotmcil noted the Personnel Committee meeting of March 6, 1981 and made <br />no comments regarding the same. <br /> <br />C. LETTERS AND CO~UNICATIONS <br /> <br />The council noted the following letters and commmnications and made so further <br />comments: <br /> <br /> 1. Letter dated February 27, 1981 to 16201 Nowthen Blvd Re: <br /> On-Site Septic System Health Hazard <br /> 2. Letter dated February 27, 1981 to 17409 St. Francis Blvd Re: <br /> Health Hazard Septic System <br /> 3. Letter dated February 25, 1981 from [~ Dept of Transportation Re: <br /> Proposed Ramsey Airport <br /> 4. Letter dated February 18, 1981 from Anoka Comaty Re: Review of <br /> Anoka County Comprehensive Plan <br /> 5. Letter dated February 25, 1981 from Anoka Comaty Joint Law <br /> Enforcement Council minutes <br /> 6. Letter dated February 25, 1981 from Metro Council Re: Plans and Specs <br /> for Anoka Interceptor <br /> 7. Letter dated Febraury 12, 1981 from Metro Waste Control Commission <br /> Re: Anoka Interceptor <br /> 8. Letter dated February 25, 1981 to Governor Quie Re: Legislative issues <br /> 9. Letter dated March 10, 1981 to Governor Quie Re: State Aid <br />9.A League of MN Small Cities letter to State Legislators Re: State Aid <br /> iO.A Letter dated March 4, 1981 from Dennis Berg, Chairman Burns Township <br /> Board, regarding approval of our comprehensive plan <br />ll.A Letter from Marilyn Gallagher dated March 4, 1981 re: Landfill <br /> <br />D2 COUNCIL OLD BUSINESS: <br /> <br />1. Dennis Donovan, Park & Recreation Chairman, regarding proposed <br /> Bond Issue. <br /> <br />Dennis Donovan talked about what the term committment means. The park board <br />is concerned and must have the council support of the proposed project. The <br />park board feels the bond issue needs a committment from the council and the <br />citizens should decide if they want to provide the services or not on the <br />recreational facilities. He further stated the park board doesn't feel <br />the 8% figure for the bond interest rate is realistic or an accurate reflection <br />of cost to the citizen. He stated the Springstad agent says the 8-8.75% <br />difference is approximately $1.00 per year per household. Also the waiting effect <br />is questionable and that the Springstad agent stated it is a volatile market, <br />and that a 10 year 8.5% figure is within reality and could guarantee the <br />inflation rate would be higher in the future. If the bond issue passes there <br />is the possibility that once interest is accumulated, the difference between <br />8% and 8.75% rate could be made up. Mr. Donovan suggested proceeding now <br />in a committed fashion. <br /> <br />C/March 10, 1981 <br /> <br /> <br />