My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/11/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council - 01/11/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:56:30 PM
Creation date
1/15/2016 12:24:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/11/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
454
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
predictable and the Attorney can be asked to attend in advance. However, some unanticipated legal issues <br />will undoubtedly occur and may result in delayed responses if the Attorney's input is needed. <br />. Legal Liability: The Attorney is often helpful in crafting motions or providing legal advice to Council at <br />meetings that may prevent the Council from having legal issues down the road. Again, most of these issues <br />can be anticipated in advance of the meeting and the Attorney invited to attend. Other city professional staff <br />in attendance also will offer responses based upon their training and expertise in their relative field (e.g., City <br />Administrator, City Clerk, Finance Director, HR Manager, City Engineer, City CD Director/Planner, Police <br />Chief, and Fire Chief). <br />. Relationship. What kind of relationship does the City Council want with its Attorney? If the Council has <br />limited contact with the Attorney, the relationship becomes different, and more of a distant, outside <br />consultant type. <br />. Flexibility. The City Attorney is open to either the original proposal, or the alternative. The Attorney has also <br />indicated the willingness to review the agreement as necessary to have a workable solution for the contract. <br />In other words, the City could try the alternative, as a "pilot" effort to see if it meets the City's needs, needs <br />adjustment, or revert back to the previous contract. The City is currently working on a 30 -day contract, so the <br />Council may adopt the original contract proposal, adopt the proposed alternative, or postpone the contract to <br />the next meeting to allow additional time to review. <br />Note, the City's Purchasing Policy provides that an RFP will be solicited every three years for standard city services <br />related to such professional services, unless specifically extended by City Council. Approval of this contract <br />extension will specifically extend the contract up to four years, however, the contract may be terminated by either <br />parry with a 30 -day notice. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff is recommending Council approve the extension of the contract for civil legal services with the law firm of <br />Ratwik, Roszak, & Maloney, P.A.. The term of the agreement will be from January 1, 2016 through December 31, <br />2017. <br />Action: <br />Motion to approve extending the contract for civil legal services with the law firm of Ratwik, Roszak, & Maloney, <br />P.A. for the term January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. <br />Contract for Legal Services <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 01/07/2016 05:16 PM <br />Form Started By: Jo Thieling Started On: 01/07/2016 04:02 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 01/07/2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.