Laserfiche WebLink
[a] Has the vendor demonstrated a thorough understanding of the purpose and scope <br />of the project (the entire initiative, including what is expected of the vendor)? <br />EVALUATOR'S NOTES <br />[b] How well has the vendor identified pertinent issues and potential problems or solutions <br />related to the project? <br />EVALUATOR'S NOTES <br />[c] Has the vendor demonstrated an understanding of the deliverables the City expects it to <br />provide? <br />EVALUATOR'S NOTES <br />1.02 Meeting the Design Challenge Score <br />Weight - 20 Percent - Maximum Point Value for this evaluation <br />100 Points x 20 Percent = 20 Points <br />Rating Scale (20 point maximum) <br />Point <br />Value Explanation <br />0 <br />1-5 <br />6-10 <br />11-15 <br />16-20 <br />None. Not addressed or response of no value <br />Fair. Limited applicability <br />Good. Some applicability <br />Very Good. Substantial applicability <br />Excellent. Total applicability <br />Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below. Do not assign points to <br />individual questions; instead, award a total score for each evaluation criterion. <br />[a] Has the vendor demonstrated an emphasis upon dynamic play events promoting <br />challenge, agility and coordination for the 5-12 age group? <br />EVALUATOR'S NOTES <br />[b] Has the vendor provided events and activities encouraging cognitive and imaginative <br />play for the 2-5 age group)? Are these two different age groups adequately <br />separated? <br />