Laserfiche WebLink
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND SCORING <br />Vendor Name <br />Name of Proposal Evaluation Committee Member <br />Responsiveness: The following is a generalized, yes/no portion of the proposal evaluation. <br />A 'No' evaluation would need to be qualified or justified in order for the vendor's proposal to proceed <br />for consideration. <br />[a] Was the proposal received on May 6th? Yes X No <br />EVALUATOR'S NOTES <br />[b] Did the vendor specify an installation date? Yes No <br />EVALUATOR'S NOTES <br />[c] Did the vendor submit a 'complete and distinct' proposal? Yes No <br />EVALUATOR'S NOTES <br />[d] Is the proposal 'complimentary to the surrounding environment'? Yes No <br />EVALUATOR'S NOTES <br />THE TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS USED TO SCORE THIS PROPOSAL IS 100 <br />1.01 Overall Understanding of Project Score <br />Weight -10 Percent - Maximum Point Value for this evaluation <br />100 Points x 10 Percent = 10 Points <br />Point <br />Value <br />Rating Scale (10 POINT Maximum) <br />Explanation <br />0 None. Not addressed or response of no value <br />1-3 Fair. Limited applicability <br />4-6 Good. Some applicability <br />7-9 Very Good. Substantial applicability <br />10 Excellent. Total applicability <br />Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below. Do not assign points to <br />individual questions; instead, award a total score for each evaluation criterion. <br />