Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 <br />April 9, 1979 <br />Council Meeting <br /> <br />Mayo r <br /> <br /> ATTEST: <br /> <br />MX~lon ilatr~l~ddTli2Stiilt~s Mayor Gamec <br />/~or}~e~~. 'Vo~ing ~o: Non~. , Councilmen Cox, Roi:mann and <br /> <br /> RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR IMPROVEMENT'OF'161ST AVENUE N.W. FROM <br /> <br />ARMSTRONG BOULEVARD TO VARIOLITE'(SORTEBERG ADDITION). <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked if the City would have to bond for the City's share of <br />the project for $27,850 or if the City could do some of the work themselves. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka said the City could do the grading and Class V. <br /> <br />Administrator Schnelle said this would have to be charged to time to the <br />project even though the General Fund pays for it. <br /> <br />Councilman Reimann asked if this expense would affect the City's taxes. <br />Engineer Raatikka said that it would not, not directly. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Cox, seconded by Councilman Reimann to accept the <br />Feasibility Study for 161st Avenue N.W. from Armstrong Boulevard N.W. to <br />Variolite Street N.W. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilman Cox, Councilman <br />Reimann and Councilman Sorteberg. Voting no: None. <br /> <br />RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF'161ST'AVENUE', N.W. FROM <br />ARMSTRONG BOULEVARD 'TO LLAMA STREET, THEN 'LLAMA~STREET N.W. 'FROM"161ST <br /> <br />AVENUE N.W. TO 163RD AVENUE N.W, (OAKRDIGE ESTAT-ES '~LA~). <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec questioned why there is a breakdown with two different amounts <br />in this assessment. <br /> <br />Engineer Raatikka replied that on normal residential streets you have <br />people abutting the property who pay the assessment, however, on this <br />project you have other benefitting property owners in the project that <br />do not directly abut the street. <br /> <br /> <br />