My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/30/1979 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1979
>
Minutes - Council - 04/30/1979 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:22:44 PM
Creation date
5/13/2004 10:42:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
04/30/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special Meeting - Council <br />April .30~-Z!~79 P. age <br /> <br />PCA - We are aware of it, our budget is limited, we sample this site and <br />17 others and in looking at the lab tests we felt that the well could have <br />nitrate due to reasons other than the landfill. <br /> <br />Mr. Sha said he is the first to concede that some of the perimeters are <br />expensive to obtain but in perspective in what it might create for the people, <br />Waste Management could get the money back from the people it serves to pay <br />for that service. The City is not seeing the monitoring results. After the <br />City's request~ sampling results were sent too late for us to do anything <br />about it. When there is an abnormal sample, the logical thing to do is <br />go back and resample it and find out what it is and where it's coming from, <br />this isn't being done, it is being written off. The City is concerned about <br />the heavy metals because of the sludge operation that was going on for years. <br />There ought to be some annual examinations in the sampling wells and private <br />wells. We are concerned with what's down there that Ramsey will have to <br />live with a good long time. <br /> <br />Councilman Cox said his point is that the people came here to get answers <br />from the agencies that control the landfill. These agencies should realize <br />what the people have to put up with. The City as a governmental body is <br />treated as though we don't exist. It is almost impossible to get any cooperation. <br />The answer to our engineer's letter was pretty much telling us to go fly a kite. <br />He doesn't think it is appropriate for these agencies to treat the City in that <br />manner when the City is trying to be accountable to its people. <br /> <br />PCA responded that they are not a local zoning agency. The~vare state-wide. <br />Homes have been constructed since the time the landfill was first created, <br />it is a problem of proximity. <br /> <br />Councilman Cox said that he didn't hear Mr. Otter answer any questions with <br />a yes or no. The City has to depend on agencies like PCA to see that things <br />are done. It is about time credibility and accountability come back to <br />government. People deserve answers. <br /> <br />L. Ziemer asked who pays for cleaning up water that is contaminated. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec said that it would probably result in a lawsuit running from <br />three to five years. <br /> <br />Councilman Cox said who could prove the landfill caused the contamination. <br /> <br />Mr. Dunn said he has viewed a 55 gallon can at a home near the dump that <br />he could see someCh'i~gwas dumped out, who knows what it was, who knows that <br />someone doesn't drive around duri.ng the night dumping chemicals. <br />Where is the list of concerns going to end. <br /> <br />Councilman Cox said someone should accept the responsibility of periodic <br />monitoring of what is being dumped~ hazardous waste has to be coming 'into <br />the landfill more than we want to think about. <br /> <br />Mr. Hutchinson commented on a "Bar Study", which provides for going to <br />the source to control what is being dumped. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec announced that the remainder of the meeting would be a Special <br />Council meeti.ng to consider alternative ways of assessing a proposed <br />street improvement for 161st Avenue N.W. lying betweeng Armstrong Blvd N.W. <br />and Llama St. N.W. and Llama St. N.W. lying between 161s~,t Ave. N.W, and 163rd <br />Avenue N.W. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.