My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/26/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2016
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/26/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:46:59 PM
Creation date
1/29/2016 10:07:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/26/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Legislature. Specifically, the legislation <br />would forbid law enforcement agents from <br />acquiring customer information from pawn <br />and secondhand shops until they have <br />probable cause to do so, and would <br />eliminate the authority of local units of <br />government to more strictly regulate pawn <br />and secondhand dealers. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports the authority of cities to <br />regulate and license pawnbrokers, and <br />opposes any legislation that would remove <br />the authority of local governments to <br />enact more restrictive regulations than <br />currently exist in Minn. Stat. ch. 325J. <br />The League supports the authority of <br />cities to set licensing and transaction fees <br />that enable them to recover their full <br />regulatory and enforcement expenses. <br />The League supports cooperation <br />between law enforcement agencies and <br />the pawn industry that enhances the <br />ability to identify illegal activity and <br />recover stolen property. Access to <br />transaction information by law <br />enforcement agencies is vital to <br />accomplishing this goal. Further, the <br />sharing of information through the use of <br />the APS is a proactive way to prevent <br />property and other crimes. <br />SD -35. Compensation and <br />Reimbursement for Public Safety <br />Services <br />Issue: Municipal public safety personnel <br />often respond to emergencies involving non- <br />residents. For example, municipal fire, <br />police, and/or ambulance services may be <br />dispatched to the scene of a traffic accident <br />on an interstate highway involving victims <br />from other cities or states. Although cities <br />can bill for some public safety services they <br />provide to non-residents, they have limited <br />authority to collect on unpaid bills. <br />Cities have also found that auto insurance <br />policies vary when it comes to coverage for <br />emergency responses. Insurance companies <br />of those responsible for accidents sometimes <br />deny payment for fire and ambulance <br />service. <br />Additionally, municipal public safety <br />personnel commonly respond to <br />emergencies that require the provision of <br />medical services. The medical services <br />provided by the city -employed first <br />responders are part of a continuum of health <br />care that is covered by insurance companies <br />when provided by paramedics and other <br />medical care providers; however, insurance <br />policies vary when it comes to coverage for <br />municipally provided medical services. <br />Insurance companies of those treated by <br />municipal public safety personnel frequently <br />deny payment for emergency medical <br />services when they are billed by a <br />municipality. <br />Thus, when a municipal public safety <br />agency provides first response medical <br />assistance, they commonly do so at the <br />expense of local property taxpayers. While <br />emergency responses are legitimate <br />functions of municipal public safety <br />departments, the costs of providing services <br />to non-residents should not be borne by the <br />community's taxpayers. <br />Response: Cities should be compensated <br />for emergency responses they provide to <br />non-residents. They should have the <br />authority to bill for the full cost of fire <br />and ambulance services they provide, and <br />to collect on unpaid bills. <br />Further, while emergency medical <br />responses are legitimate functions of <br />municipal public safety departments, the <br />League of Minnesota Cities <br />2016 City Policies Page 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.