Laserfiche WebLink
costs of providing emergency medical <br />care to individuals should be covered by <br />insurance and not be borne exclusively by <br />the community's taxpayers. Cities should <br />have the authority to bill for the full cost <br />of first responder medical services they <br />provide and to collect on unpaid bills. <br />Insurance companies should be required <br />to reimburse local governments for the <br />full cost of providing these emergency <br />medical services. Finally, auto and <br />homeowners insurance policies should be <br />required to insure for the cost of <br />emergency responses. <br />SD -36. Administrative Traffic <br />Citations <br />Issue: Cities have implemented <br />administrative enforcement programs for <br />violations of local regulatory ordinances, <br />such as building codes, zoning codes, health <br />codes, and public nuisance ordinances. This <br />use of administrative proceedings has kept <br />enforcement at the local level and reduced <br />pressure on over -burdened district court <br />systems. <br />The Legislature has repeatedly increased the <br />fine surcharge on district court cases to <br />generate revenues for the state's general <br />fund. The surcharge—the amount paid over <br />and above the fine—is now $75 per citation. <br />The growth in the surcharge has <br />dramatically increased the cost of citations <br />and has caused some to question whether the <br />total of the fine and surcharge is <br />disproportionate for minor matters. To lower <br />the amount imposed on their residents, a <br />number of cities have expanded their <br />administrative programs to include some <br />offenses traditionally heard in district court, <br />such as minor traffic offenses. <br />The increased state surcharges have not been <br />used to assist local units of government with <br />the growing costs of enforcement and <br />prosecution. No matter which entity—city, <br />county or state—issues a statutory citation, <br />the violator pays between $115 and $127 for <br />a minor speeding violation. Of this amount, <br />the city receives between $13 and $20, and <br />the county receives just slightly more. <br />Further, when a violator requests relief from <br />paying the full amount of the fine and <br />surcharge, the courts have been more <br />inclined to waive the fine than to reduce the <br />surcharge. When this occurs, the local units <br />of government recover no costs even though <br />the city has incurred expenses. <br />In 2009, the Legislature amended the <br />statutes to allow administrative fines to be <br />issued for certain minor traffic offenses. <br />Cities report that the short list of offenses <br />noted in that law change does not adequately <br />address the needs of local law enforcement. <br />Additional authority is necessary to allow <br />law enforcement officers to implement an <br />effective program to reduce violations. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities continues to support the use of city <br />administrative fines for local regulatory <br />ordinances, such as building codes, zoning <br />codes, health codes, public nuisance <br />ordinances and regulatory matters that <br />are not duplicative of misdemeanor or <br />higher level state traffic and criminal <br />offenses. Cities should have the authority <br />to issue administrative citations for low- <br />level moving and equipment violations <br />that: 1) would otherwise result in <br />warnings, and 2) occur on roadways <br />where the speed limit is 45 miles per hour <br />or less. Further, the League endorses the <br />concept that, if the recipient of an <br />administrative penalty wishes to appeal <br />the issuance of an administrative fine for <br />a violation before a disinterested third <br />party, the party may opt to be issued a <br />standard traffic citation and appeal its <br />issuance before the district court. <br />League of Minnesota Cities <br />2016 City Policies Page 24 <br />