Laserfiche WebLink
Public Comment Report <br />Andrie Street and 164th Lane Reconstruction <br />Section 1: Comments from Owners of Assessed Properties <br />Table 1 (below) and the accompanying pie charts show the stated preference of each of <br />the 21 assessed households that provided comment during any of the three public input <br />meetings regarding the presence of bike lanes and parking on Andrie Street and 164th lane. A <br />preference for bike lanes should be interpreted as a desire to see dedicated bike lanes. A <br />preference for parking should be interpreted as a desire to see some amount of on -street parking <br />preserved (respondents favored several different amounts of parking preservation). "No Stated <br />Preference" generally means that the submitted comment did not address the issue. In cases <br />where a couple jointly owning one assessed property gave conflicting statements of preference, <br />their responses were added to the "No Stated Preference" column. <br />Table 1. Assessed Properties: 21 Total Responses <br />Yes No No Stated Preference <br />Dedicated Bike Lanes 3 13 5 <br />Parking 14 3 4 <br />Assessed Properties: Do You Assessed Properties: Do You <br />Want Parking? Want Dedicated Bike Lanes? <br />111 <br />■ Yes ■ No ■ No Stated Preference ■ Yes ■ No ■ No Stated Preference <br />Note: Eight (8) of the respondents who did want parking but did not want a dedicated bike lane <br />expressed support for a "multi-purpose lane" that could accommodate on -street parking as <br />well as bikes and pedestrians when vehicles are not parked. <br />1 <br />