Agenda - Council Work Session - 02/08/2016

Home

CC Work Session 2. 3. Meeting Date: 02/08/2016 Information Title: Discussion Regarding a Possible Revision to the Current Employee Sick Leave for Wellness Policy Purpose/Background: This case has been carried forward from the November 10, 2015 work -session due to a lack of adequate time at that meeting and is a continuation of the June 23, 2015 discussion. The purpose of this discussion is to seek the City Council's approval, by consensus this evening, to either 1) revise the City's current Sick Leave for Wellness Policy and direct staff to bring it back at the next regular meeting for adoption, or 2) to keep the current policy in its current form. If the City Council is in favor of revising the current policy, the new title of the policy will be Vacation / Sick Leave for Wellness, or another title as determined by the City Council. The current Sick Leave for Wellness policy includes only the use of accrued sick leave; the policy is attached. In summary, the revisions sought would amend the current policy to include the optional limited use of one to three vacation days per year to help offset the cost of approved wellness activities or to increase deferred compensation savings for employees. This limited use of up to one to three vacation days would not be available to employees until their 6th, 12th and 18th anniversary. As shown on the attached draft policy, there are provisions within the policy limiting its use and ensuring a win-win outcome for both the City and its employees. Additionally, according to the League of Minnesota Cities, employee friendly, alternative uses of vacation time (within established policies) are on the rise. As the City Council will recall, this discussion started back in June. At that time, staff was directed to revisit this issue with the Labor Management Committee (LMC) to further refine the policy by removing language that was specific to an organization, such as Weight Watchers, and to more clearly identify the types of eligible wellness activities. As a result, staff brought the policy back to the LMC for discussion and further revision. The Committee had an extensive discussion regarding the types of wellness activities that might be eligible for payment. The Committee was able to add clarity and additional detail to the list of eligible items. However, after much discussion, it was determined that the policy needed to retain language that provided for some flexibility in determining if certain actives would be eligible for payment, leaving the Human Resources Manager with some discretion to consider requests on a case-by-case basis. The Committee felt that it was impractical to list all possible eligible activities and attempting to do so would be inefficient. Therefore, the newly revised policy adds additional detail where practical, but leaves some discretion to the Human Resources Manager, in cooperation with the City Administrator. The Committee discussed the eligibility of exercise equipment and confirmed their desire to keep it in the policy as an eligible item; especially as an alternative option for employees that may not wish to leave their home to go to a public gym. In addition, the current draft policy now identifies an appeals process for employees to follow in the event there is a denial by the Human Resources Manager; appeals will be reviewed by the City Administrator and his/her determination will be final. Note: The scope of this current draft policy, if adopted, will cover non-union employees. It is anticipated that AFSCME will negotiate to amend the 2015-2016 contract, which contains the original Sick Leave for Wellness policy to exactly mirror the updated non-union policy. It is also anticipated that Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS) will negotiate in an attempt to follow -suit as well; however, LELS does not currently have any such policy.