My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
04/25/77
Ramsey
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970's
>
1977
>
04/25/77
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2006 2:49:38 PM
Creation date
5/14/2004 11:09:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regular Meeting <br />april 25, 1977 <br />Page .5 <br /> <br />would require such an amount of time to either remove the dogs or relocate. <br />Instead, it was discussed if they should be granted a conditional use permit <br />and not the practicalities of what would happen if the permit was not <br />grante~. <br /> <br />Mr. Geurwitz said they were asking that the Van Odegaards be allowed to <br />remain in their present location with their dogs until September 15, 1977. <br />They will hurry up moving as quickly as possible. They could possible be <br />out before that time if they can find buyers etc. He said that to say they <br />have only 90 days to do this is a bit short on time. The dogs have been in <br />there for 2-1~2 years. To say now that they can stay 90 days and no longer, <br />when they are asking for only an additional 1-1/2 months. <br /> <br />George Merely st~od up and read a letter from the Greiners, next door <br />n~ighbor to the Van Odegaar~s. It said they felt the Van Odegaards should <br />not be granted more than 30 days. They are trying to sell their house, but <br />the realtor wants no more open house because of the dogs howling. <br /> <br />Mr. Merely stated that the Van Odegaards are in violation of the city <br />sanitary laws. He asked that Anoka Sanitary Department check into this <br />to see if there is any pollution of water because of dog waste. <br /> <br />He also stated that he had proof that they operate a professional kennel <br />and are in violation of a law. Ne read from a magazine in which an ad <br />for Karlan D Kennel, giving the address of Van Odegaards, was published. <br /> <br />John Tillery, 12775 Florine St., was happy to hear the permit was denied <br />at the hearing. Ne thinks 90 days is carrying it too far and that 30 <br />days would be a better recommendation. <br /> <br />Mrs. Van Odegaard said they asked the Greiners many times if they objected <br />to the dogs and they always said no. She said dogs got out once and got <br />into Greiners garden and Mrs. Van Odegaard o~fered to pay to have someone <br />redo the garden, but Greiners said no. Van Odegaards paid $15.00 for one <br />little white rabbit the dogs got. Mrs. Van Odegaard said the only other <br />thing they did was to buy several rabbits from them to help out Greiner's <br />SOn · <br /> <br />In reference to the ad Mr. Green read, Mrs. Van Odegaard said it is not a <br />listing of a commercial kennel. They are members of the Minnesota Dog Assn. <br />which does not allow them to be a commercial kennel. They are also listed <br />with every vet so that a~ene who wants a goed~ well-bred~ healthy dog, can <br />get one. The Van Odegaards hope to make a reputation for themselves as <br />good hobby breeders. <br /> <br />Mrs. Van Odegaard said the chemicals they put into the ground are not harmful. <br />She said that beer poured on the ground wc~ld put more chemicals in the <br />ground than theirs does. She also said that one of her neighbors who was <br />at the hearing will verify that Mr. Merely lied at the hearing. She also <br />said that Mr. Greiner signed a petition saying he was not opposed to the <br />dogs in the neighborhood. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.