My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 12/06/1977 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1977
>
Minutes - Council - 12/06/1977 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:54:08 PM
Creation date
5/14/2004 11:40:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
12/06/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br />Special Meeting/C <br />December 6, 1977 <br /> <br />also explained that the rough-in as placed in Room #9 was <br />done in that manner as a part of cost cutbacks prior to bid <br />letting. With regard to the use of exposed ducts through- <br />out the building Mr. Boarman indicated that the archi- <br />tectural design is generally accepted in the industry and <br />has won several awards for outstanding design. Mr. Boarman <br />also indicated that the most important thing to him, however, <br />was that the owner was not happy. <br /> <br />Mr. Jack Wilberding of Setter, Leach and Lindstrom reempha- <br />sized what Mr. Boarman had indicated and also suggested that <br />in his opinion it would be a mistake to enclose the duct <br />work at this point, feeling it would hurt the overall build- <br />ing design. He also stated that he did not feel there was <br />any financial responsibility on the part of Setter, Leach <br />and Lindstrom to correct the exposed duct. He felt that <br />the exposed duct was clearly indicated in the communications <br />and contract documents prior to bid letting.~ <br /> <br />Dave Mickelson agreed that while he was on the Building <br />Advisory Committee the exposed duct had been discussed but <br />did not feel that the extent of use was clearly indicated. <br /> <br />Mr. Wilberding also indicated that there were cost consider- <br />ations as well as design considerations that went into the <br />proposal of exposed duct. <br /> <br />Addressing some of the other issues, Mr. Boarman indicated <br />that Setter, Leach and Lindstrom does regret the oversight <br />on the part of the mechanical plans to provide a lift pump <br />for the drainfield. He indicated that Setter, Leach and <br />Lindstrom has a responsibility for the mechanical engineers; <br />but that they do not have complete control because they are <br />contracted and not the engineers of Setter, Leach and Lind- <br />strom. Mr. Boarman indicated that Setter, Leach and Lind- <br />strom does take responsibility for the error of the lift <br />station for the drainfield which was discussed at an earlier <br />council meeting. It was his feeling that the mistake comes <br />about as a part of the work pressures related to this pro- <br />ject for 90 day on-site labor after grant offer. He indi- <br />cated that Setter, Leach and Lindstrom has negotiated a <br />settlement with Nelson-Rudie, the mechanical engineer, for <br />the approximately $1,600 change order to install the lift <br />pumps. <br /> <br />Mayor Cox indicated that after the discussions of this meet- <br />ing he is resigned to the fact that the exposed duct will <br />have to be kept in place, however, he feels it important <br />Setter~ Leach and Lindstrom be aware that the client is not <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.