Laserfiche WebLink
size and meets the minimum size requirements for a total of 6 lots. <br /> <br />The Commission is reluctant to even consider the plat as proposed without <br />input from the County Engineer. <br /> <br />The Commission recommended that Mr. Menkveld redraw the plat with a cul-de- <br />sac configuration and if the County Engineer is approached, inquire as to <br />the appropriate amount of right-of-way that should be acquired in the event <br />of upgrading to Cry. Rd. #63. <br /> <br />The Commission also requested input from Police Chief Auspos regarding this <br />particular stretch of Cry. Rd. $63 and his opinion with respect to allowing <br />3 more accesses onto it. <br /> <br />Case $6: Review R1-U Residential Zoning: Case Of Mr. Sidney Schaumber9: <br /> <br />Mr. Schaumberg was present and stated that in 1981 he specifically <br />purchased a sufficient an~unt of land to develop as an ingress/egress with <br />additional one acre lots to access his 80 acre parcel to the east, which <br />was zoned Urban Residential and required a minimum lot size of one acre. <br />With the city's recent rezoning, the larger parcel was designated to R1-U <br />and developable with one acre lots; the strip of property accessing the <br />80 acres was designated R1-R with a minimum lot size of 2-1/2 acres. Mr. <br />Schaumberg is requesting that the city rezone that strip of property to <br />R1-U in order that he can develop that and the 80 acre parcel as originally <br />intended. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson inquired if the Commission should give consideration to <br />rezoning just Mr. Schaumberg's property or rezoning all property within the <br />general urban area, not just the 1990 urban area, to Ri-U. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Shumway to proceed with appropriate processes to <br />rezone that strip of property owned by Mr. Sidney Schaumberg and located <br />outside the 1990 Urban Area but within the Urban Area from R1-R to R1-U. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Chairman Peterson noted that rezoning for Mr. <br />Schaumberg's case only or rezoning all urban areas to R1-U, will require a <br />public hearing. Consensus was to address Mr. Schaumberg's property only at <br />this time. Commissioner Deemer noted that the property would still not be <br />developable until it fronts on a public street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Commissioner Deemer stated that he feels it is <br />incorrect for the city to go through the expense of rezoning a small piece <br />of property based on speculation when historical data backs Mr. <br />Schaumberg's claim to develop that strip of property with one acre lots. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Shumway, <br />Zimmerman, Hendriksen, LaDue and Howell. Voting No: Commissioner Deemer. <br /> <br />It was noted that in the historical records no specific mention of one acre <br />lots was made; it was suggested that Ms. Norris get input from the Council <br /> P & Z/February 3, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 7 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />