Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Shumway, <br />Hendriksen, Deemer, Zimmerman and LaDue. Voting no: None. Absent: <br />Commissioner Howell. <br /> <br />(Note: At this time, Chairman Peterson left the meeting.) <br /> <br />Case #4: Request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Autumn Meadows: Case <br /> Of Mr. Ken Johnson <br /> <br />Mr. Richard Vagle was present representing Mr. Ken Johnson. Mr. Vagle <br />explained the revised preliminary plat contained four lots and a cul-de-sac of <br />Nutria Street less than 600 feet long. <br /> <br />Mr. Jeff Struwve, 8453 168th Lane N.W. commented that the City Council's <br />concerns had been regarding a second access to the plat. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen to <br />recommend approval of the revised preliminary plat of Autumn Meadows provided <br />the drainage plan for the original plat is retained. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Commissioner Hendriksen commented on the Park Commission's <br />recommendation of fees to satisfy the City's park dedication requirements. Vice <br />Chairman Zimmerman noted that the revised plat meets the City Code. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Vice Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners LaDue, <br />Hendriksen and Deemer. Voting no: None. Abstaining: Commissioner Shumway. <br />Absent: Chairman Peterson and Commissioner Howell. <br /> <br />Case 95.: ~equest for Metes and Bounds Subdivision: Case of Mr. William <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Hendriksen and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to table <br />this case until a representative of Mr. Loucks is present. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Vice Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners LaDue, <br />Hendriksen, Deemer and Shumway. Voting no: None. Absent: Chairman Peterson <br />and Commissioner Howell. <br /> <br />Case~6: Request for Concept Review of Planned Unit Development Proposal: <br /> ~ase of Mr. Art Raudio <br /> <br />Mr. Art Raudio was present and explained his proposal for a planned unit <br />development for residential and home occupation uses south of 149th Avenue N.W. <br />and west of County Road 956. Mr. Raudio stated that he was seeking the <br />Commission's comments on proposed covenants for this P.U.D. as well as traffic <br />and drainage in the area. <br /> <br />The Commission reviewed the proposedcovenants. The Commission noted that the <br />City Attorney and City Engineer should review the P.U.D. and covenants. The <br />Commission questioned whether retail should be permitted as retail often <br />generates high traffic and how to limit retail activities. Mr. Raudio <br />requested clarification regarding screening requirements. The Commission <br />commented that signage may be uniform - size, colors, shape, etc. The <br />1/6/87 - Planning and Zoning Commission <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />