My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/22/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 02/22/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 11:56:52 AM
Creation date
5/18/2004 9:06:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/22/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~. Harold Phelps is requesting a variance to the subdivision ordinance. ~e <br /> re,est, if authorized, would permit him to build a single f~ily residence <br /> on a 30 acre parcel with the only access being an easement granted by the <br /> adjoining property o~er to Avenue ~. <br /> 177th <br /> l There are situations similar to this in the City where the requests have been <br /> approved as well as situations where they have been denied. <br /> <br /> / <br /> ~is has been reviewed by the Pla~ing and Zoning Commission and they recommended <br /> ~ denying the request based on their findings of fact. <br /> <br /> ~e following ite~ are included as enclosure (D2-d) for yo~ consideration in <br /> this matter: 4 ~~~' . ~ <br /> <br /> a) ~. Phelps, application --~~/~'~ <br /> b) ~plicant s letter of re~est ~ <br /> c) Copies of the governing section of the ordinance -- <br /> d) ~ea location map <br /> e) Proposed findings of fact <br /> f) Planning and ~ning Commission minutes dated Jan~ry 4, 1983 <br /> <br /> Co~cil Action: Yo~ action in this matter will be to adopt/deny/Mend the <br /> ~ct and approve or disapprove of the re~est. <br /> <br /> CASE #7: PETITION FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES; CASE OF MR. ART ~UDIO AND MR. NO~ HO~: <br /> <br /> The a~ve referenced property owners, along with a few other individuals, have <br /> petitioned for tr~k availability to their properties in the southeast corner <br /> of the City. If your intent is to only serve and assess those specific proper-i <br />: .~~ ties on the petition, then you co~d assume that the project is petitioned for <br /> by 100% of the affected property o~ers. <br /> <br /> However, this wo~d prob~ly not be wise so we would recommend that you merely <br /> note you have received the petition and proceed with a City initiated project <br /> requiring a 4/5 vote. ~is then not only mandates the need for p~lic hearings, <br /> but also requires a ~tter unification of the City Council on an issue that <br />I will have a long te~ impact on the City. <br /> ~ satisfy the requirements of the petition and the needs of the area to <br /> <br /> accommodate development, it will be necessary to adopt a resolution directing <br /> the City Engineer to prepare feasibility studies for the following items: <br /> <br />~ a) Trunk sanitary sewer <br />b) Trunk storm drainage <br />c) Trunk watermains and related structures (Wells, etc.) <br /> <br /> The City Engineer's letter regarding this issue is included as enclosure (D2-e). <br /> <br /> Council Action: If you want to proceed with this, your action will be to'~adopt <br /> the proposed resolutions ordering preparation of report on the proposed-pr0jects. <br /> The following proposed motions are hereby submitted for your consideration: <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.