My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/28/1983 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 03/28/1983 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 11:57:32 AM
Creation date
5/18/2004 10:19:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
03/28/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />A significant new ~se of special assessments is in the redevelopment of <br />existing neighborhoods. When residential areas are confronted with <br />progressive deterioration or even when presently sound neighborhoods <br />can be made more desirable through the development of parks, <br />playgrounds, tree plantings and new street patterns, the City can <br />utilize special assessments to good advantage. <br /> <br />THE BENEFIT PRINCIPAL <br /> <br />Special assessments may be levied only upon property receiving a special benefit <br />from the improvement. In Minnesota, the Constitution and courts apply this <br />general rule by placing the following limitations upon the power to levy special <br />assessments: 1) the rate must be uniform and equal upon all property receiving <br />special benefit; 2) the assessment must be confined to property specially <br />benefited; and 3) the amount of the assessment must not exceed the special <br />benefit. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF STEPS IN SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS <br /> <br />Initiation of Proceedings. This may be done either by the Council or <br />by petition of affected property owners. If a petition is used, it <br />must be signed by the owners of at least 35% in frontage of the <br />property bordering on the proposed improvements. Even if the Council <br />act~originally on its own initiative, an extraordinary majority is not <br />needed to initiate the proceedings. In initiating proceedings or in <br />accepting a petition requesting such proceedings, the Council should <br />simultaneously order a feasibility report on the proposed improvement. <br /> <br />Preparation of a Report. The law requires that a report on the <br />feasibility of the proposal be prepared by the City Engineer or by some <br />other competent person selected by the Council. It must cover such <br />factors as the need for the project, an estimate of cost and any other <br />information thought pertinent and necessary for complete Council <br />consideration. <br /> <br /> 3. Public Hearing. This step may be omitted when a petition requesting <br /> the ~mprovement has been signed by 100% of the affected land owners. <br /> Notice of the hearing must be published twice in the official newspaper <br /> with each publication appearing at least a week apart. At least three <br /> (3) days must elapse between the last publication date and the date set <br /> for the hearing. Furthermore, a notice must be mailed to each property <br /> owner in the area to be assessed stating the time and place of the <br /> hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the estimated cost and <br /> the area proposed to be assessed. At the hearing, all interest persons <br />_~heu3~d have a chance to be heard whether or not they are liable to be <br /> assessed. <br /> <br />Ordering the Improvement and Preparation of Plans. The resolution <br />ordering the improvement may be passed by a majority of the Council if <br />proceedings were originally commenced by petition. If not, the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.