Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CASE #3: <br /> <br />CASE #4: <br /> <br />Motion by and seconded by %o submit the <br />name of ~L~%~Z~~ to the Minnesota State Hazardous Waste <br />Board for consideration for appointment to the Processing Area <br />Task Force. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes <br />Voting no . <br /> <br />ACCRUAL OF ADDITIONAL VACATION TIME: <br /> <br />I have spoken to the Council Personnel Committee informally about the <br />accruing of additional vacation time. We currently have the following <br />persons who will be in this situation: <br /> <br />1) Clayton Berg <br />2) Lloyd Schnelle <br /> <br />Accordingly, they have recommended that it be placed on the agenda for <br />discussion and action. ~ <br /> <br />Problem - Due to workload here, we have certain City Staff personnel who <br />will be losing vacation time. During the past years they have lost days <br />but now it is getting ridiculous to continue on making these contributions. <br />The reason we are finding ourselves in this position is strictly because <br />of the immense workload we always have confronting us. <br /> <br />Consequently, we are requesting that we be allowed to accrue additional <br />vacation days above and beyond what is currently authorized under the <br />City Code so that we do not lose this time. I guess this is the price <br />you pay when you maintain below minimum staffing. It is a very cheap <br />price to pay. <br /> <br />Council Action: Your action will be to approve/disapprove of the above <br />request by resolution. Enclosure (D2-d) contains said resolution. The <br />following proposed motion is hereby submitted for your consideration: <br /> Motion by ~/,!,~_.Z//.~.~,and seconded by~i'~,~¢.?"'~ to approve/disapprove <br /> of adopting Resoiuti~n 983- authorizing th~ accrual of additional <br /> vacation time. Please refer to resolution [file for Resolution #83- <br /> . (~f you disapprove you should .~.i~.~ an explanation.) <br /> <br /> Motion carried. Voting 7es ~.,~,_Z" · <br /> Voting no ..~.. I ~. · <br /> <br />CITY NEWSLETTER: <br /> <br />It has been requested by the City Attorney that this be placed on the <br />agenda. It appears that Council had much discussion and liked the idea <br />but never approved of the newsletter by motion. <br /> <br />Comments: I have received very favorable comments on this publication <br />and I think the citizens really enjoy it. <br /> <br /> <br />