Agenda - Council - 05/09/1983 - Special

Home

I I I I i ! I i ! ! ! ! ! family of three. The City reviewed their proposed~salary range as covered in enclosure (1). d) Mr. Dwight Martin, 17521 Chameleon Street NW, Ramsey, MN - Mr. Martin gave a brief summary of his work experience. The duties of this position were explained to him. The dommittee also re- viewed the contents of enclosure (1) with Mr. Martin. e) Mr. John Dunham, 3413 - 47th Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN - Mr. Dunham gave a brief summary of his work experience. The committee explained the duties of this position and the proposed salary range as covered in enclosure (1). Mr. Dunham stated that J he was interested in a job that afforded security and consequently wouldn't object to taking a pay cut. f) Mr. Lyle Illg, 16361 Nowthen Blvd. NW, Ramsey, MN - Mr. Illg gave a brief summary of his work experience. The'committee explained the duties of this position and the proposed salary range as covered in enclosure (1). Mr. Illg stated that this job would require him to take a reduction in pay and he hadn't thought about a salary cut. Consequently, he~would like to think about that if he were offered the 'job. After int&~viewingall the candidates, the committee reviewed their findings and made the following recommendations: 1) 2) Mr.' Mark Boos was the committee's first recommendation. It is felt that this individual would best fit into this particular job because of his work experience with the City on a part-time basis and that he could better adjust to the difference in pay from a light equipment operator and'a heavy equipment operator when they are both doing the same jobs. This was also the Public Works Superintendent and City Administrator's recommendation. Mr. John Dunham'was~the committeeJs-secon~hoice~_~This_ individual's resume and interview indicated that he is a very fine person and he did indicate that he wouldn't object to taking a cut in sa!ary;tpro- viding he could find a job that would offer security such as this position. He also stated that he could adjust to the difference in pay between a light equipment operator and a heavy equipment operator when they would be doing the same work. The committee only recommended two choices to the Council. The Other four individuals were fine men, however, they were not recommended for the follow- ing reasons: 1) Mr. Kenneth Daly indicated that he would have to take a salary cut to accept this position and he didn't really want to leave his present job. but he was concerned that he might get laid off because of a slowdown and the economic condition in the State. 2) Mr. Stone was not as experienced as the first and second choices and maybe would need more experience in the field-before considera- tion. Personnel Committee/May 2, 1983 Page 2 of 3