Laserfiche WebLink
A landfill or resource recovery facility may be located where planned or' <br />future public services, such as sewer and waster, will be installed. <br />However, the waste facility may not need the service, or its benefit to <br />the property may be minimal. Consequently, state law would permit only a <br />nominal assessment, if any. The community would have fewer property <br />owners paying for the public improvements.~ Therefore~ the waste facility. <br />owner should compensate the local unit of government for the' additional <br />costs of the public improvements. <br /> <br />Currently, monitoring and inspection costs during operation and after <br />closure of the site fall upon the state, county or landfill owner. The <br />MPCA and counties are r6sponsible for inspecting the landfill or resource <br />recovery facility for compliance with state and county regulations° <br />Counties regulate monitoring of landfills after closure. The costs of <br />monitoring the groundwater during operation and after closure fall upon <br />the waste facility owner. Information from groundwater monitoring and <br />related data should be shared by the MPCA, county, and municipality or <br />township. Nevertheless~ the waste facility owner'should bear the costs <br />of additional monitoring that may be needed by the community. <br /> <br />The waste facility owner also should be responsible for any costs result- <br />ing from the facility's disruption of planned water and sewer services <br />that are offical components of an approved comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />In fact, compensation for all the indirect costs of a waste facility that <br />fall upon the municipality or township should be negotiated by the land- <br />fill owner and local unit of government. If an agreement cannot be <br />reached~ the waste facility owner~ countS or local unit of government <br />should be permitted to appeal to the Metropolitan Council. The Council <br />would assist the parties in coming to an acceptable agreement or con- <br />tract. New legisl~{'ion is n~eded that would permit local units of govern- <br />ment the legal au_tho~ity to assess the waste facility owner a fee for its <br />indirect costs associated with the facility.. If an agreement or contract <br />cannot be achieved~ the Council should be granted the authority to estab- <br />lish an agreement. <br /> <br />END USE <br /> <br />The end uses for landfills are limited, falling into three major categor- <br />ies; agriculture, commercial or industrial uses, and recreational open <br />space. A closed landfill can be returned to pasture or cropland. If <br />used for crops, the final overlying cover should be thick enough that the <br />roots or cultivation machinery does not penetrate buried waste material. <br />Otherwise, crops may adsorb contaminants from the landfill. <br /> <br />Commercial or industrial land uses may require extensive footings and <br />foundations for buildings. These factors require special engineering <br />that must be incorporated into the landfill's design and operation. Con- <br />struction is certainly acceptable on the buffer zone area and adjacent to <br />the fill area. Roads, parking lots, sidewalks and other paved areas are <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />