My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/26/1983
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1983
>
Agenda - Council - 07/26/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 11:59:58 AM
Creation date
5/18/2004 12:51:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/26/1983
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />'1 <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> / <br /> / <br />~UDY BOSCHWITZ <br />,' MINNESOTA <br /> <br />WASHINGTON, D.C, 2:O510 <br /> <br />June 30, 1983 <br /> <br />Hon. Thomas Gamec <br />Mayor of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Blvd. N.W. <br />Anoka, Minnesota 55303 <br /> <br />Dear Mayor Gamec: <br /> <br /> I thought you migh~ be interested in ]knowing <br />the Cable Telecommuni~ions Act (S:. 66)' <br /> <br />COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: <br />AGRICULTURE <br /> BUDGET <br /> FOREIGN RELATIONS <br /> SMALL BUSINESS <br /> VETERANS AFFAIRS <br /> <br />the status of <br /> <br /> The full- sehate..took up Cons]derafion of S. 66 on June 13 <br />and 14 and approve~ .it by.a vote of 87-9. In my opinion, even <br />with the adopted am~'ndm~n'ts'-ah~"the committee changes, the bill <br />is inadequate. I believe it takes too much cont'rol away from the <br />local communities and transfers it to.the federal government and <br />the cable companies. In keeping with my position as an advocate <br />of local control, I voted against S. 66. <br /> <br />I <br />i <br /> <br /> Several amendments were offered to S. 66. Two amendments <br />that I believe would have improved the bill were defeated. One <br />amendment would have disallowed an automatic, annual rate <br />increase by cable companies. The second amendment proposed <br />"grandfathering" into the bill all previous cable agreements. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />In spite of amendments ! offered with Senators Lautenberg <br />(D-New Jersey), Exon (D-Nebraska), and Durenberger, we were not <br />able to produce a final bill that I could support. As it now <br />stands, the local communities will have their authority abrogated <br />through this legislation. <br /> <br /> Senate bill 66 has been referred to the House for <br />consideration. If you haven't done so-already, I suggest you <br />con tact your Representative and ex pr~ss-~our concerns. <br /> / /. <br /> Thanks for your interest in thSs matter. <br /> <br /> S' c, erely, <br /> <br /> Rudy Boschwitz <br /> United States Senator <br /> <br />RB/mc <br /> <br />// <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.