Laserfiche WebLink
This case was reviewed by the City Council on Tuesday, December 09, 2014. At the time, the Council was <br />considering two offers. General direction from the Council was to negotiate a Purchase Agreement with NIK <br />Management; and to bring it back in January 2015 for consideration. The attached NIK Management Purchase <br />Agreement was reviewed by the EDA on 01/08. The EDA did pass a motion to recommend the City Council <br />approve this agreement. Below are comments made by the EDA: <br />• Staff should work with NIK Management to negotiate earnest money terms (i.e. amount and when it becomes <br />hard). The EDA was especially concerned with the second closing. Staff will attempt to renegotiate this term <br />before 01/13 (improve the City's position). <br />• The EDA did discuss an option to remove the second phase of this project from this particular PA. This <br />alternative was considered by the EDA to allow the City time for "uncertainties" of the second phase to <br />become clearer (i.e. access resolution and site clean-up costs to be finalized). After discussion, the EDA did <br />not move forward with this alternative. Reasons included: existing NIK deal ties up phase two with a <br />competitive offer price, both access and site clean up need to occur (now or in the future, may be a moot <br />point), this deal will support the initiative for a new Fire Station #2, the PA includes protective language <br />regarding phase two (in the event Fire Station #2 is not built). <br />• The EDA had questions regarding minimum architecture. The City's Community Development Director Mr. <br />Gladhill indicated what minimum standards are in place today; and that minimum standards will result in a <br />product similar to the surrounding neighborhood. <br />• The EDA had questions regarding internal traffic circulation, if phase two never occurred. The City's <br />Community Development Director Mr. Gladhill indicated that a future development agreement with the <br />buyer for phase one of the proposed development would require a contingency to address said issue (i.e. <br />dollars to pay for cul-de-sacs). <br />• If available, minutes from the EDA meeting will be forwarded to the City Council before 01/13. <br />Background (Land Use) <br />From a land use perspective, the proposed project is set for review by the Ramsey Planning Commission on 01/08 <br />(from a preliminary plan perspective). Results of said meeting will be disclosed during the presentation of this case; <br />or may be viewed online at QCTV.org. <br />Important Note on Access from County Road 5 <br />The existing access to the this site from Nowthen Boulevard will be a major topic to discuss/resolve before <br />the second proposed closing. The existing Nothewn Boulevard access is not owned by the City of Ramsey. <br />Said access has been granted via a temporary easement. When the old municipal center site develops, the <br />City will lose this temporary access easement. Therefore, the City needs to identify a solution to this problem. <br />Attached to this case are access alternatives. This item will be discussed at a January 08 public open house <br />and with the Planning Commission. Additionally, staff is working with affected property owners and Anoka <br />County to validate alternatives. With proper public input, Planning Commission input, property owner input, <br />and the feasibility of alternatives in -hand, Staff will bring this open item to the City Council for direction. <br />This item does not need to be resolved before signing this agreement. It will need to be resolved before the <br />second closing. <br />Notification: <br />NA <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Observations <br />Listed below are highlights of the proposed Purchase Agreement with NIK Management: <br />1. $929,000 total offer price ($41,500 per acre for phase one and $43,500 for phase two). NOTE: the total <br />listing price for this property was $860,000 ($40,000 per acre). <br />2. The proposed deal includes a two -phased closing (first closing on 14 acres in June of 2015 and second <br />closing on 7.5 acres in June of 2016). <br />3. The second closing requires the City to deliver a "construction -ready" site. Meaning, removal of existing <br />structures, improvements (parking, driveways, etc.), capping wells, removal of septic tanks (if needed), etc. <br />