My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/24/1982
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 08/24/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:31:47 PM
Creation date
5/19/2004 10:44:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/24/1982
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />i <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> Updated accounting and financial reporting systems are an <br />integral part of management that is ready to meet the challenges <br />of hard decision-making. Only with this current and reliable data <br />can you as financial managers provide the executive and legislative <br />leadership with the bases upon which to make intelligent decisions. <br />It is therefore not the bond rater alone who is looking for evidence <br />of modern management tools. You, as daily practitioners ought to <br />be demanding it. <br /> <br /> We are often asked whether an issuer can improve its present <br />bond rating. We respond by indicating that management ought to focus <br />on those elements that are mostly within %heir direct control. For <br />example, manaoement cannot change %he location of %he unit.~ Often, <br />location itself is an important factor in the economy'. Discretionary <br />elements would include improved planning and budgeting so that <br />financial results will reflect such policy guidelines. We prefer <br />an avoidance of reliance upon short-term debt instruments. We prefer <br />to see a b~]anced debt policy so that bonds are issued to pay for <br />capital projects when all project costs are in. Al%bough the local <br />economic base is usually not under the direct control of management, <br />mun~c~ps]_ities can, by adopting an orderly climate in planning, <br />zoning and ]and use encourage a balanced economic environment which <br />is most conducive to achieving a positive feeling for investment <br />w~thin the community. Sometimes, a current rating wilt be difficult <br />to improve due to serious economic base dislocations Which are not <br />indicated to be subject to likely improvement. On the other hand, <br />in more cases than not, management does have within its grasp,-the <br />ability to enhance ~he credit quality of a bond issue. <br /> <br /> In ]ate 1980, Standard & Poor's Corporation adjusted Baltimore <br />County's general obligation bonds to 'AA+' from 'AA' and the same <br />rating was recently confirmed. I have reproduced some material <br />from our files on the county indicating the basis for our rating <br />rationale. You will note that we emphasized the economic base as <br />well as financial management as key factors in'the rating. <br /> <br /> As far as a rating presentation, Baltimore County again showed <br />its sophistication by including representatives from the executive, <br />legislative and economic development sectors in its recent delegation <br />to visit S&P. In most cases then, %here is a good chance to improve <br />your bond rating by really working at it; keeping the rating agency <br />informed with reliable, complete and timely data which will go a <br />long way to build credibility--so important in the bond rating <br />process. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.