Laserfiche WebLink
! <br />i <br />I <br /> ! <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />'1 <br />I <br />I <br />'1 <br />I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> On an overall basis, we would consider the economic base and <br />operating fund analysis as the most critical elements in our <br />determination of municipal bond ratings. An examination of the <br />operating fund tells us about revenue-expenditure imbalance, <br />working capital position and whether the municipality may be <br />heading for trouble. <br /> <br /> As indicated earlier, one major aspect of the rating process <br />is the measurement of fiscal results over a period of time as well <br />as planning and budgeting for the future. An examination of these <br />elements together with other credit measuring tools will bring us <br />to a total credit picture or profile as indicated by our municipal <br />bond ratings. Outlined for your information in herein is our <br />complete worksheet for general obligation bonds. As you can see, <br />some of the major factors include not only revenues and expenditures <br />covering the major operating funds but also balance sheet data. <br />The existence of short-term debt, the accounting basis, unfunded <br />liabilities, budget data, economic base and management factors. <br /> <br /> If management's financial policy does not translate itself into <br />strong bo%tom line financial performance and a strong financial <br />position (balance sheet), then questions may be raised as to either <br />financJ~al controls and policy and/or the quality of management. <br />There are situations where there is a mediocre economic base, but <br />very strong financial performance. This is an indicatfon that <br />management is able to maximize its economic base in terms of bottom <br />line results, and it can be a positive factor in the rating decision. <br /> <br /> Although it should be made clear that S&P does not and cannot <br />perform an audit function, S&P can and must take into account in its <br />rating process the reporting and accounting standards being used <br />by the credits under review. Our statement on this subject has <br />been widely circulated since its initial publication in May, 1980. <br /> <br /> Also, although not part of the audit itself, a management letter <br />would be extremely useful in that it may point out any weaknesses or <br />deficiencies in financial and/or management controls. <br /> <br /> Many asked about trigger points leading to rating changes. <br />In this regard I call to your attention a set of early warning <br />guidelines that we use in our rating process and can also serve <br />management as a tool; found as an exhibit at the end of the worksheet. <br /> <br /> Although financial trends are a major credit determinant, they <br />do not by themselves determine credit quality. A vital ingredient <br />in any enterprise remains management and an ever-present credit <br />ingredient remains the quality of the management .team %hat comes to <br />grips with adversities and manages to make the difficult decisions <br />that often have to be made. This can result in the difference <br />between a high grade credit and one that is less desirable. The <br />reliability of information is an important element in our view of <br />management. Management ought to keep in regular contact with the <br />bond raters. What we probably disapprove of most is being surprised <br />by a development %hat the full disclosure environment would indicate <br />ought not to occur. <br /> <br /> <br />