My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/21/1982
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 12/21/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:33:26 PM
Creation date
5/20/2004 8:50:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/21/1982
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br /> <br />costs as indicated below: <br /> <br /> a) Ramsey Development Park <br /> b) Ramsey Maintenance Shop <br /> <br />$2,218.00 <br /> <br /> 300.00 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />$2,518.00 <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cox, <br />Sorteberg, Reimann and Van Wagner. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that right now there are two parks going <br />~nto the City of Ramsey and has Council considered how much it <br />is going to maintain these parks? <br /> <br />Council recessed at 9:12 P.M. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec called the Council meeting back tO order at 9:27 P.M. <br /> <br />Case #7: <br /> <br />Legal Items (A. Howard's Special Assessment Appeal; <br /> <br />B. Menkveld Mobile Home Park Regarding Request For <br />Conditional Use Permit): <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />a) How'ardT~s Special Assessment Appeal: <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich informed Council that the Howard's have <br />appealed the assessment, that he does not know when the hearing <br />date will be and it may be necessary to attain an appraiser on <br />behalf of the City to testify that the property is benefitted. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that the Howard's assessment is consistent <br />with City's past policy regarding similar situations. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated that he agrees to some degree, but <br />that the road was put in by a developer and the Howard parcel <br />was not part of that development. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sorteberg stated that there is no question that <br />the City should follow through with this matter, that the City <br />is being consistent. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Van Wagner and seconded by Councilmember <br />Sorteberg t6 direct City Attorney to oppose the appeal and <br />further that the City Attorney accomplish whatever else'he <br />determines legally necessary in this case. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers <br />Van l~agner, Reimann and Sorteberg: <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Councilmember Sorteberg stated that the <br />parcel in question is large, a developer put in a road adjacent <br />to the parcel, it is a sort of land locked parcel, and how <br />would you subdivide the parcel without allowing a longer-than- <br />normal cul-de-sac? <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec requested a vote from Councilmember Cox. Council- <br />member Cox voted "no'-' requested £or'a ~res-t-atement of the' <br />motion, Council secretary, di'd s.o and Councilmember Cox changed <br /> C/November 23,2~982 Page 13 of <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.