Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />MEMO <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />City Council and City Administrator <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />City Engineer <br /> <br />RE' <br /> <br />Surface Water Management Meetings <br /> <br />DATE' December 16, 1982 <br /> <br />Since your last regular council meeting, I have attended two meetings <br />in regard to the organization of the Upper Mississippi River Watershed. <br />The first meeting was held on December 2, 1982 and the second meeting <br />was held December 9, 1982. <br /> <br />As indicated on the attached minutes from the December 2nd meeting, <br />it was agreed at the meeting to try to split the Upper'Mississippi <br />River Watershed by the river to cut down the number of communities <br />involved. It was also the concensus of the group that the cities <br />should try to form some type of organization so the counties or some <br />other form of government do not take control and dictate additional <br />laws and regulations on the cities. One alternative discussed was <br />to form an umbrella organization with sub-organizations or taxing <br />districts. <br /> <br />At the December 9th meeting, Mr. Mel Sinn from the Water Resources <br />Board and Mr. Marcel Jouseau from the Metropolitan Council were present <br />to explain some of the specifics of the new law. <br /> <br />They indicated that the intent of the law was to set up watershed <br />districts within the seven county metropolitan area to control surface <br />water runo£f and minimize pollution. An organized watershed is to <br />consist of the aggregation of two or more minor watersheds in two or <br />more cities. In addition, major watersheds such as Coon Creek are not <br />to be divided. They also stated that according to the DNR, a minor <br />watershed is to consist of a minimum of five square miles. <br /> <br />It was Mr. Sinn's and Mr. Jouseau's opinion that the Upper Mississippi <br />River Watershed could be split. They also said that if the intent of <br />the law is met, adjustments to the law could be made. <br /> <br />We also discussed the map of Watersheds for Surface Water Management <br />recently sent out by the Metropolitan Council. Both City Engineer <br />Johnson from Anoka and myself stated that in Anoka and Ramsey's case, <br />runoff from our cities did not cross political boundaries prior to <br />outletting into the Mississippi River. Therefore, part of the organization <br />law may not apply to Ramsey or Anoka. <br /> <br />I discussed this further with Mr. Sinn, and he indicated I should contact <br />the DNR in regard to being exempted from the Water Management Law. Any <br />exemption will require a law change. <br /> <br />- 1 - <br /> <br /> <br />