Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />FINEINGS OF FACT <br />WALTEC, iNC. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />6) <br /> <br />7) <br /> <br />8) <br /> <br />9) <br /> <br />That on November 24, 1982, Mr. Gene Walters of Waltec applied for a Board <br />of Adjustment variance and paid the fee as established by City Ordinance. <br /> <br />That Mr. Walters appeared before the Board of Adjustment at a publi~ hear- <br />lng held Tuesday, December 21, 1982. <br /> <br />That said public hearing was published in the City official newspaper as <br />required by ordinance and that said public hearing notice is hereby incor- <br />porated as a part of these findings by reference. <br /> <br />That notice of said public hearing was mailed to the adjoining property <br />owners as required by City Ordinance. <br /> <br />That there are unique circumstances that apply to the property in question <br />that do not apply to other properties in general in that previous develQp- <br />ment resulted in structure locations that made expansion difficult if <br />proper setbacks were to be maintained. <br /> <br />That such a variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial <br />property right. <br /> <br />That the authorizing of such a variance will not be of any substantial <br />detriment to the adjoining properties and will not materially impair the <br />intent and purpose of this ordinance or the public interest. <br /> <br />THat this specific situation is not of so general or recurrent a nature <br />to make practical the formulation of an ordinance governing such situations. <br /> <br />That the variance observes the spirit and intent of this ordinance, pro- <br />duces substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest. <br /> <br /> <br />