Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />c. Ramsey has requested ant} ~;tt~uately addresses the need for <br /> the construction of the second connection. The specific <br /> timin§ and stagin§ of the interceptor construction and the <br /> availability of sewer service will be determined as part of <br /> the MWCC's Development Program and Capital Budget amendments. <br /> <br />d. Ramsey's sewer policy plan is consistent with the Council's <br /> Water Resources Management Development Guide (Part 1) in that <br /> the city has adequately addressed the on-site system <br /> management guidelines recommended in the Development Guide to <br /> accompany Ramsey!s proposed rural densities. <br /> <br />2. Transportation <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Ramsey's plan is consistent with the Transportation Policy Plan. <br /> <br />3. Parks <br /> <br />The Ramsey Comprehensive Plan conforms with the Regional <br />Recreation Open Space System. <br /> <br />4. Airports <br /> <br />The Ramsey Comprehensive Plan adequately addresses the control of <br />general airspace obstructions and seaplane use areas. The city <br />has delayed plans to relocate the Gateway Airport, and has <br />indicated its intention of amending the comprehensive plan <br />should a new airport be developed. The city plan is consisten~'~~'~:~' <br />with the Aviation chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide~ <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I- <br />I <br /> <br />C. Compatibility with Other Governmental Units' Plans <br /> <br />Adjacent and affected governmental units have been notified that <br />Ramsey's comprehensive plan is being reviewed by the Metropolitan <br />Council. <br /> <br />The City of Anoka has raised concerns about the Size and <br />intensity of land uses adjacent to Anoka. Their com~nents are <br />contained in Attachment V. It appears that'Anoka's concerns are, <br />partially addressed by subsequent revisions to the Ramsey plan. <br />Any remaining concerns are of a local nature and should be <br />worked out between the cities. .- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I' <br /> <br />D. CRnsiste. ncy with Other Guide Chapters <br /> <br />'1. Metropolitan, Development Framework <br /> <br />The plan's household forecasts are somewhat higher than Council <br />,'forecasts. However, their use of a lower household §ize and <br />Council employment forecasts which are too high would tend to <br />reduce the potential 'impact on metropolitan systems. The plan <br />manages new growth in both the 1990 Urban' Service Area and the <br />Rural Service Area so as to be consistent with Development <br />Framework policy which justifies the city's request fo.r a second~ <br /> connection to the .metropolitan sewer system.".'_. .. ~ .. <br /> .- . .'...' .'.-.'-'-.t. ~.- - .~..: ' <br /> <br /> <br />