My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/27/1982
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 04/27/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:29:50 PM
Creation date
5/20/2004 10:52:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/27/1982
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TNORPE 1135 WEST <br /> <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />.I <br /> <br />BLDG., ~ MAIN STREET,, ANOKA/ MINNESOTA 55303, TEL. 421-2503 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br />RE: <br /> <br /> March 16, 1982 <br /> <br />John Rutford, Referral Coordinator ~ ~! <br />Metropolitan Council, St. Paul 55101 . <br /> <br />Anoka County SWCD Board of Supervisors <br /> <br />Anoka County - Draft Environmental Impact Statement County R~ <br />f/ll6 Extension from CSAH #7 to TH #47, Bridge Construction over <br />the Rum River - Ramsey, Andover and Anoka - Metro Council Referral <br />File ~1037~-1 <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The Anoka SWCD Board has reviewed and re-evaluated the Rum River bridge. <br />construction project. The Board would like to point out some of their <br />concerns and their choice of alternative sites. <br /> <br />First of all, we want to point out that prime ag lands affected in this <br />project range from no acres for alternative#A to about 6 acres for <br />alternative #Da. Any alternative which removes prime ag land from pro- <br />duction should be looked at from the standpoint of less food or other <br />essentials being available for consumption in the future. Or, if the <br />production from that lost land can be replaced by production from other <br />farmland that is not prime land, the production will Cost us more in other <br />finite resources, such as, energy and soil erosion. <br /> <br />We agree the acreage pf prime land involved in any of the proposed routes <br />is not large. But~ we do not believe the total future impact of all the <br />little projects in this county can be ignored any longer. Each project <br />must reduce its effect on loss of prime ag lands to the absolute minimum <br />if we are ever going to appreciably slow the loss of our most productive <br />land to projects like this which will remove this land from production <br />for the foreseeable future. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.