Agenda - Council - 04/27/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

l) 2) Council will need to adopt resolution declaring that Project #80-16 was improperly assessed and then call for a new public hearing to reassess the total project. City will have to accomplish the following administrative pro- cedures: aa) Mail out public hearing notices to reassess Project #80-16 involving approximately 65 parcels. bb) Recompute assessment rolls to reflect new dollar amount. cc) Redo all special assessment identification cards. dd) Resubmit letter to each property owner which will afford him the opportunity to pay his assessments in full. Submit reassessed Project ~80-16 to Anoka County so that they can make appropriate corrections to their records which are maintained on computer. ff) Any citizen who has paid his assessment in full then would be refunded the difference which would have been created by reassessing this project. Problem - We have seven parcels where they have paid off the assessments in full. In some cases we may not know who is entitled to the refund until it is researched out. Consequently, as we informed you in the Council agenda of April 5, 1982, this is going to be an expensive administrative task. Here is how it shapes up: Assessment was (67 units) $1,510.74 per unit Would change to (72 units) Represents a reduction of 1,405.83 per unit $ 104.91 per unit Council Action: If Council proceeds with a reassessment hearing you will need to adopt a resolution to call for public hearing to reassess the total project by reason that the project was in- correctly assessed out. The following proposed motion is hereby submitted for your consideration. Please refer to enclosure (D2-b) for proposed resolution: Motion by and seconded by to adopt Resolution #82- Resolution Calling for a Hearing on Proposed Reassessment of Public Improvement Project #80-16. Please refer to resolution file for Resolution #82- Motion carried2 Voting yes Voting no