Laserfiche WebLink
CASE #11: <br /> <br />However, according to our City Engineer, this proposal is of no <br />value to us and we should reject their proposal. <br /> <br />Enclosure (D3-i) contains the following items for your consider- <br />ation: <br /> <br />1) Letter from Anoka City Manager and their proposal. <br />2) Letter from City Engineer Raatikka regarding this <br /> issue. <br /> <br />Council Action: Your action should be to reject Anoka's pro- <br />posal and have the City Engineer inform them why it was rejected. <br /> <br />R_FI_Q_U_E_S_T__F_O__R__PAYMENT ON CONSTRUCTION TO DATE FOR THE LOWER LEVEL: <br /> <br />Due to the nature of the work this has been included as an agenda <br />item for your approval instead of merely placing it in the bills. <br />The request is in the amount of $25,335.00. This request has <br />been approved by the architect, Building Inspector and JoAnn <br />Wright at the H.U.D. office. <br /> <br />When we have made payment we will then send a copy of our check <br />to H.U.D. as they need it before they can make payment back to us. <br />According to Ms. Wright, this will take about two.weeks. <br /> <br />However, 'we will not be able to withhold payment until we receive <br />payment back because we have to make payment to our contractor <br />within 30 days of his request for payment. <br /> <br />The following enclosures are included for your consideration: <br /> <br />~" 1) REquest for payment <br /> 2) Building Inspectors memo <br /> 3) Contract terms of payment <br /> Council Action: eYOUr action will be to approve/disapprove of this <br /> request for paym ut. <br /> <br /> CASE #12: AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER FUNDS FROM LANDFILL TRUST FUND: <br /> <br /> In August of 1980, Waste Management deposited with the City an <br /> escrow fund amount of $5,000 to cover various costs the City may <br /> incurl To date according to our records $11,742.49 has been <br /> 4_ expended and the account is $6,742.49 overdrawn. <br /> <br /> <br />