My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/09/1982 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 02/09/1982 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:28:09 PM
Creation date
5/21/2004 11:46:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
02/09/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Proposed <br /> <br />FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THOSE AREAS <br />PROPOSED TO BE REZONED FROM <br />RURAL OPEN SPACE TO RESIDENTIAL <br /> <br />That the subject property is legally described as follows: <br /> <br />a) The West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of Section 17, Township <br /> 32, Range 25, Anoka County. <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />d) <br /> <br />Section 18, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County. <br /> <br />That part of Section 19, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka <br />County lying northerly of the Burlington Northern <br />Railroad right of way. <br /> <br />The West 1/2 of the NC[rthwest 1/4 of Section 20, <br />Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota. <br /> <br />and is generally known as the General Mills property <br />located north of Highway 10'nat the City's westerly <br />boundary. <br /> <br />That the owner of the parcels has not formally applied for <br />the rezoning request but has attended council meetings and <br />written letters suggesting that an amendment be made. <br /> <br />That the City Council has proposed this zoning district <br />amendment. <br /> <br />That the ROS zone is misleading as it is often interpreted <br />to mean a park space zone and this is not the intended use <br />for the subject property. <br /> <br />That a public hearing on the proposed amendment was held by <br />the Planning Commission on February 2, 1982. That <br />published and written notice of the hearing was properly <br />given to the public and a copy of said notice is hereby <br />incorporated in these Findings. <br /> <br />That the Planning Commission's February 2, 1982 public <br />hearing minutes are incorporated herein by reference. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.