My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/26/1982
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 01/26/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:27:52 PM
Creation date
5/21/2004 11:58:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/26/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
! <br /> ! <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The role of Anoka County in the land use planning process <br />according to the plan is intended to include the following <br />elements: <br /> <br />a. The formulation and adoption of county-wide land use and <br /> housing policies, <br /> <br />The formulation and adoption of a generalized land use <br />plan for the County which may be used in guiding the <br />delivery of County and municipal services, both current <br />and projected. <br /> <br />The review of local land use plans and zoning ordinances <br />relating to the protection of significant natural <br />resources, and the review of specific significant <br />development proposals which may have an .impact upon the <br />County transportation, parks, or solid waste ~isposal <br />systems. <br /> <br />The Plan's goals and policies closely parallel those of the <br />Metropolitan Development Framework and thus are largely <br />consistent with MDF. The Plan provides, for example, that new <br />development in the general urban area should only be allowed with <br />the orderly and economic extension of municipal sewer and water <br />facilities and that these facilities should only be provided <br />within the general urban area. Only low intensity uses are <br />encouraged in the general rural area. Maintaining viable <br />commercial agricultural regions is supported. The Plan also <br />contains policies supporting the Freestanding Growth Center of <br />Anoka, the Proposed Freestanding Growth Center of St. Francis, <br />and rural centers (with development at a scale appropriate to <br />their ability to finance and administer services). <br /> <br />The Plan does not mention a recommended development density in <br />the general rural area. The Council's guideline for density in a <br />general rural use region is one housing unit per 10 acres. The <br />County is encouraged to apply this standard in its planning. <br /> <br />Since the Plan was prepared, the Metropolitan Agricultural <br />Preserves Act (1980) was passed that provides farmers with tax <br />and other incentives to continue farming in exchange for a <br />commitment to maintain the agricultural use. While responsibil- <br />ity for designating agricultural areas rests with the unit of <br />government with primary land use and zoning authority (thus <br />townships and cities within Anoka County), the County might <br />describe agricultural preserves in its Plan and encourage <br />agricultural preserves within the County's planning process. <br /> <br />The CouD~y indicates in Policy II on page LU-21 that "communities <br />containing land areas within the General Urban Use Area (under- <br />lining added) should encourage the continued ~'arming of existing <br />agricultural lands in locations not immediately programmed for <br />urban development." The policy further indicates that the Green <br />Acres law or other preservation legislation might be employed to <br />preserve a§ricultural land. Application of this policy may be <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.